Comments on: Japanese Tank Destroyers – Part I http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: 23r0_NA http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-164434 Sun, 22 Jun 2014 02:48:42 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-164434 They had an 88 mm AA gun as a matter of fact (which was considered for use on the Chi-Ri, but they settled on a 75 mm AT gun instead)

]]> By: Battle_Pope http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-164081 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:43:37 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-164081 On first sight I would say that they would still need light tanks with good gun depression and elevation. Mediums might be usefull on some places but I don’t think there’s terrain close to Japan where heavy tanks would be usefull, unless someone can tell me otherwise.

]]> By: 1n_Soviet_Russia http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163726 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:06:25 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163726 after the war the allies scrapped and destroyed many fine prototypes and beautiful machines. Many crops were lost… Bastards

]]> By: Crate http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163725 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:53:13 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163725 Considering it seemed to pursue an expansionist policy, would they have considered fighting in their home islands or would they have designed their equipment with foreign territory in mind?

]]> By: tolegenx http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163721 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 03:26:24 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163721 Very very sad picture… http://ftr.wot-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Y7hGfmSl.jpg

]]> By: Skarakien http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163712 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:41:58 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163712 My favorite pokemon is CHAR MARDER.

]]> By: Battle_Pope http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163691 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:37:42 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163691 It probably has something to do with the terrain there. Japan and its isles consists mostly of mountains and forrests. So when you need tanks for that kind of terrain, you need small and light tanks with good gun depression and elevation.

]]> By: TheTuberKnownAsMe . http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163683 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:59:28 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163683 New german waffle line is not different :D

Low pen tank need their exp too, i guess.

]]> By: elwiscomeback http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163668 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 18:09:37 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163668 I think I´Marder leave

]]> By: Dexter5021 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/19/japanese-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-163661 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:26:55 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13380#comment-163661 And their SPGs will have negative armor?

]]>