<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 21.6.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: houmer56</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164788</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[houmer56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why on earth does this thing need a buff? For tomatoes to camp more? 

When people realize that these brutal alpha damages (WTE,JPZ,183) only support camping and ruin the gameplay? 

Seriously, you work hard the whole game to get shot for 1000+ HP (one shot by 183, oneclip by WTE) by some braindead camp monkey at the end? 

No, thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth does this thing need a buff? For tomatoes to camp more? </p>
<p>When people realize that these brutal alpha damages (WTE,JPZ,183) only support camping and ruin the gameplay? </p>
<p>Seriously, you work hard the whole game to get shot for 1000+ HP (one shot by 183, oneclip by WTE) by some braindead camp monkey at the end? </p>
<p>No, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavel_p</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pavel_p]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 06:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? m48 is faster, more agile, has better gun handling, can peek-a-boo better, both have terrible camo, both are huge, both can occasionally bounce shots, just gun depression and fully aimed accuracy are slightly better. It&#039;s my first tier X, i can&#039;t compare it to other/better mediums so it seems quite ok to me. As well as M46 Patton and Centurion7, both have some strength.

Just don&#039;t understand why is track repair time on Fatton two times slower than on Patton (8 vs 4 seconds). I think they should buff it, cause any medium can keep you perma-tracked.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? m48 is faster, more agile, has better gun handling, can peek-a-boo better, both have terrible camo, both are huge, both can occasionally bounce shots, just gun depression and fully aimed accuracy are slightly better. It&#8217;s my first tier X, i can&#8217;t compare it to other/better mediums so it seems quite ok to me. As well as M46 Patton and Centurion7, both have some strength.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t understand why is track repair time on Fatton two times slower than on Patton (8 vs 4 seconds). I think they should buff it, cause any medium can keep you perma-tracked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You sure?  Their ROF was 5 rpm at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sure?  Their ROF was 5 rpm at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164690</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Either that or significantly worse soft stats (though tbh I&#039;d probably prefer a 100 mm gun on the KV-1S anyway)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either that or significantly worse soft stats (though tbh I&#8217;d probably prefer a 100 mm gun on the KV-1S anyway)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention its RoF is something like 2 rounds per minute, 3 tops. so if they miss that first shot and can&#039;t get back into cover before the enemy counterattacks, they&#039;re screwed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention its RoF is something like 2 rounds per minute, 3 tops. so if they miss that first shot and can&#8217;t get back into cover before the enemy counterattacks, they&#8217;re screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Shiu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alvin Shiu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 05:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes please. 
Even 4202 is better than  it. The Patton got Nothing to excel and it does not do anything even decently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes please.<br />
Even 4202 is better than  it. The Patton got Nothing to excel and it does not do anything even decently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blue Toilet</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Blue Toilet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 04:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patton buff perhaps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patton buff perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 04:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact thatbyou seem to believe that being effective can be achieved with no skill puZZLEEs me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact thatbyou seem to believe that being effective can be achieved with no skill puZZLEEs me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 04:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad RoF. IS had the good RoF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad RoF. IS had the good RoF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tankload</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/21/21-6-2014/#comment-164437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tankload]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 03:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13495#comment-164437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh wait theres one :) silly me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait theres one :) silly me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
