Comments on: US T-13 Hornet B

By: SteelScooter

SteelScooter — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:46:38 +0000

I instantly thought Keystone Kops BTR-60 :)

By: Hustodemon Zewel von Lelek

Hustodemon Zewel von Lelek — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:48:11 +0000

SKOT later ;P

By: Skarakien

Skarakien — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:36:43 +0000

And amphibians.
BTW halftracks would be good to see… but it would require even MORE research on them :S

By: Mark78

Mark78 — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:27:27 +0000

Advanced? Um, no. Paper thin armor, it’s big, lacks the carrying capacity of the similar weight M2/M3 half tracks. Likewise being more expensive and complex to build then said half tracks. How can something be inferior and yet be “advanced”?

By: Dexter5021

Dexter5021 — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:52:35 +0000

Earlyer in FTR, the first prototype of the russian techtree contained a halftrack as tier I

By: SpectreHD .

SpectreHD . — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:03:57 +0000

Would you call an artillery a tank?

By: Nefertum

Nefertum — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:48:21 +0000

This game is called World of TANKS and those things you’ve mention unless they would have full tracts variants will not be implemented because they are not tanks :)

By: Radium_Angel

Radium_Angel — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:00:05 +0000

I know WoT is still in the very early stages, but vehicles like this, and the Puma, and half tracks, and M8 combat car, would be great fun in the game.
IIRC the Puma even had a 75mm mounted at one point in time.

By: nixxxie

nixxxie — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:43:37 +0000

I wouldn’t. That SKOT thing was a joke ;) . Both it and Stryker originate in APC/IFV part, whereas this thing was never meant for troop transport.

By: Woras

Woras — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:27:34 +0000

Something like it.