Comments on: Australian Archives VIII

By: Skarakien

Skarakien — Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:38:09 +0000

Thank you Sire!

By: Wolvenworks

Wolvenworks — Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:19:36 +0000

dat doctor’s handwriting

By: TheFishlord

TheFishlord — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:12:25 +0000

This proposal is apparently supposed to have a fully rotating gun, however. Check #5 on the second page. I assume that the gun is fixed to the inner hull sides, but rotates above it in any direction. Also, the 6pdr mounted would be much more powerful than the wimpy one on the UC right now.

By: RedShocktrooper

RedShocktrooper — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:47:04 +0000

This is already in game I think – it’s the tier 2 British TD.

By: Tanzer

Tanzer — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:12:14 +0000

1 – Should think that there is little in this submission that the Army has not fully considered. Understand that self-propelled guns of all kinds are receiving consideration

2 – This provides little that is new. The “Further Details” might be a help to AFV. Does — Phillip consider it with farming in to DAFV production?

3 – The carrier is overweighted with the 6 pdr this would put too much weight on the carrier. There is nothing in this submission that is not already (had among) the self propelled mounts.

Damn cryptic old-school copperplate(ish) handwriting. Again, nice post – thanks.

— AFV = Armored Fighting Vehicles

— DAFV = Director Armored Fighting Vehicles (Dude in charge)

By: FryaDuck

FryaDuck — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:33:31 +0000

If someone had bothered to read the docs they would find that G.Bradsley was a Warrant Officer Class 2 and not a Sergeant. (Sgd.) means signed. You’ll also note there is no letter d in the word sergeant.

By: nixxxie

nixxxie — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:22:21 +0000

Looks like it would instaflip after shooting. Or flip forward going downhill…

By: phdr_vrba

phdr_vrba — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:48:21 +0000

Examination: S—- think that there is little in this submission that the army has not fully considered. Understand that self propelled guns of all kinds are recieving consideration.

This provides little that is new. The “platform details” miht be a help to AFV. D— S— Phillip commitee in —th p—- — to DAFV production?

Requirements: The carrier is overweighted with the —- this would put too much weight on the carrier. There is nothing in this that is not already —– — selfpropelled mounts..

// some handwritings there

By: wotcarramba66

wotcarramba66 — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:31:07 +0000

Looks like russian AT-1. :)

By: rabiesdog

rabiesdog — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:13:56 +0000

Arghmaighad dat handwriting on pic 4… Took me 5 tries to make an overall sence of it. At least i made out why this proposal did not go any further.

Examination:—- There is little in this submission that the army has not fully considered— that self propelled guns of all kinds are requiring consideration. —-

Requirements: The carrier is overweighted with the —– this woulöd put too much weight on the carrier. There is nothing in this that is not already —- selfpropelled —-