<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wargaming Inside Info &#8211; What&#8217;s Cooking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine_Domino</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-166229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antoine_Domino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2014 07:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-166229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;17500 bot reports&quot;

Ok so, just because I feel like doing a bit of math:

Let&#039;s say that out of these 17,500 reports, about 50% of them (and that&#039;s very generous) land on players who get 25+ reports each.

That leaves: 8,750 reports
Divided by the average # reports for those type of players (let&#039;s say 30): about 290 players get called out for bots. Only 3% of those are true?
That&#039;s about 8-9 bans a day. Hardly scratches the player base, if I&#039;m doing the match correctly.

Or do you mean that less than 3% of the 17,500 are actual bots, report wise?
If so, less than 20 bans a day still, on average.

Just being curious/mathy today I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;17500 bot reports&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok so, just because I feel like doing a bit of math:</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say that out of these 17,500 reports, about 50% of them (and that&#8217;s very generous) land on players who get 25+ reports each.</p>
<p>That leaves: 8,750 reports<br />
Divided by the average # reports for those type of players (let&#8217;s say 30): about 290 players get called out for bots. Only 3% of those are true?<br />
That&#8217;s about 8-9 bans a day. Hardly scratches the player base, if I&#8217;m doing the match correctly.</p>
<p>Or do you mean that less than 3% of the 17,500 are actual bots, report wise?<br />
If so, less than 20 bans a day still, on average.</p>
<p>Just being curious/mathy today I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Weedmn1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-166058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon Weedmn1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-166058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can tell people haven&#039;t properly tried War Thunder when they mention the skidding, as that only really occurs in Arcade battles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can tell people haven&#8217;t properly tried War Thunder when they mention the skidding, as that only really occurs in Arcade battles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treborn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Treborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 06:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Katyusha, I think you`re right :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katyusha, I think you`re right :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moving dunes?

Sounds like a job for voxels. As a bonus, with a physics engine in place, you could slowly blast dunes apart, only to have them slowly reform here and there.

I can hear the CPU cores running the physics threads screeching in agony already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moving dunes?</p>
<p>Sounds like a job for voxels. As a bonus, with a physics engine in place, you could slowly blast dunes apart, only to have them slowly reform here and there.</p>
<p>I can hear the CPU cores running the physics threads screeching in agony already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 04:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Still not every player card supports Havok&quot;

Havok uses the CPU to calculate physics. I think you have it confused with PhysX, which is Nvidia&#039;s proprietary physics engine.

I guess it&#039;s always possible that they might go with GPU-accelerated Havok, but more likely than not it&#039;s going to be on the CPU for compatibility (e.g. with computers using Intel XTREME6WTFBBQ integrated graphics or equivalent).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Still not every player card supports Havok&#8221;</p>
<p>Havok uses the CPU to calculate physics. I think you have it confused with PhysX, which is Nvidia&#8217;s proprietary physics engine.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s always possible that they might go with GPU-accelerated Havok, but more likely than not it&#8217;s going to be on the CPU for compatibility (e.g. with computers using Intel XTREME6WTFBBQ integrated graphics or equivalent).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedShocktrooper</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RedShocktrooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 00:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOBODY ACTUALLY FOLLOW THIS LINK. ONLY BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL WORLD OF TANKS SITE OR AN OFFICIAL RETAILER IF YOU WISH TO BUY GOLD AND PREMIUM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOBODY ACTUALLY FOLLOW THIS LINK. ONLY BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL WORLD OF TANKS SITE OR AN OFFICIAL RETAILER IF YOU WISH TO BUY GOLD AND PREMIUM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[– the next minicampaign reward will likely be the Grosstraktor

What do they consider a minicampaign? This is only a low tier tank after all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>– the next minicampaign reward will likely be the Grosstraktor</p>
<p>What do they consider a minicampaign? This is only a low tier tank after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mybackhurts</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mybackhurts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maybe not just travel but be mapped out randomly at the start as well, like a real desert. would definately change to dynamic of sand river.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe not just travel but be mapped out randomly at the start as well, like a real desert. would definately change to dynamic of sand river.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YourNIGHTMare</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YourNIGHTMare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or the T-54. Looks like a f**kin Revel tank now, really ugly. And I haven&#039;t found a beautiful skin so far to cover it.....so it rusts away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or the T-54. Looks like a f**kin Revel tank now, really ugly. And I haven&#8217;t found a beautiful skin so far to cover it&#8230;..so it rusts away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intht tizi ouzou</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/27/wargaming-inside-info-whats-cooking/#comment-165900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Intht tizi ouzou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13653#comment-165900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1 Month PREMIUM  + 1 000 Gold for 4 $ Only ;)
Hurry up before : July 2014

http://about.me/WorldOfTanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 Month PREMIUM  + 1 000 Gold for 4 $ Only ;)<br />
Hurry up before : July 2014</p>
<p><a href="http://about.me/WorldOfTanks" rel="nofollow">http://about.me/WorldOfTanks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
