<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World of Warships Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr3awsome</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr3awsome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2014 20:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Au contraire, this 1953 image shows the USS Philippine Sea, CV-47 (last numerically of the Essex class) with the 5&quot; turrets that you are referring to
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/CVA-47_3May1953_HN-SN-98-07229.JPEG/800px-CVA-47_3May1953_HN-SN-98-07229.JPEG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Au contraire, this 1953 image shows the USS Philippine Sea, CV-47 (last numerically of the Essex class) with the 5&#8243; turrets that you are referring to<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/CVA-47_3May1953_HN-SN-98-07229.JPEG/800px-CVA-47_3May1953_HN-SN-98-07229.JPEG" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/CVA-47_3May1953_HN-SN-98-07229.JPEG/800px-CVA-47_3May1953_HN-SN-98-07229.JPEG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herman_der_German</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herman_der_German]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2014 07:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Lexingtons 8 inch mounted above flight deck level near the island while sounding impressive were not much use for the above reasons and were soon replaced.  The original Essex class design had eight 5 inch guns paired in turrets fore and aft of the island and still could damage the flight deck and nearby aircraft with their blast and were not included in later designs of that type.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lexingtons 8 inch mounted above flight deck level near the island while sounding impressive were not much use for the above reasons and were soon replaced.  The original Essex class design had eight 5 inch guns paired in turrets fore and aft of the island and still could damage the flight deck and nearby aircraft with their blast and were not included in later designs of that type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenthos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenthos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2014 05:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, people, sarcasm...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, people, sarcasm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YourNIGHTMare</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YourNIGHTMare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;..as the primary targeting mode...&quot;
____
the primary targeting mode
primary mode
primary]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..as the primary targeting mode&#8230;&#8221;<br />
____<br />
the primary targeting mode<br />
primary mode<br />
primary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re trying to get people with old PCs running XP to play. Or, at least that was the reason thy gave for keeping WoT on DX9.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re trying to get people with old PCs running XP to play. Or, at least that was the reason thy gave for keeping WoT on DX9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toasters don&#039;t support DX10 or 11, so we&#039;re all stuck at the lowest common denominator.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toasters don&#8217;t support DX10 or 11, so we&#8217;re all stuck at the lowest common denominator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revener</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Revener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[actually 460mm :)
Bigger is better  USA used &quot;puny&quot; 406mm (16&quot;)  ;)

Then again  the sound woould probably  be  very similar  to a 15 or 16 inch gun that the other navies use just a wee bit louder so......I guess you don&#039;t want to  blow your speakers :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually 460mm :)<br />
Bigger is better  USA used &#8220;puny&#8221; 406mm (16&#8243;)  ;)</p>
<p>Then again  the sound woould probably  be  very similar  to a 15 or 16 inch gun that the other navies use just a wee bit louder so&#8230;&#8230;I guess you don&#8217;t want to  blow your speakers :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FredTMK GAMING .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FredTMK GAMING .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still you dont have airstrikes or ship based artillery support in wot. But ofc the only thing you can do is insult and be a retard, GG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still you dont have airstrikes or ship based artillery support in wot. But ofc the only thing you can do is insult and be a retard, GG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodlat25</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bodlat25]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- there will be “some form of ship customization”

I wonder what would that be. In-game customization (if camo is included, that is so unhistorical like what the WT:GF did) or res_mods (That would work! But make it easy to edit).


- the game will most likely have between 4 and 10 modules to damage

This game will be more realistic than WoT. If Wargaming is the first one release realistic warship game, I wonder what will Gaijin release for their warship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- there will be “some form of ship customization”</p>
<p>I wonder what would that be. In-game customization (if camo is included, that is so unhistorical like what the WT:GF did) or res_mods (That would work! But make it easy to edit).</p>
<p>- the game will most likely have between 4 and 10 modules to damage</p>
<p>This game will be more realistic than WoT. If Wargaming is the first one release realistic warship game, I wonder what will Gaijin release for their warship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolBreeze541</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/28/world-of-warships-qa/#comment-166170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CoolBreeze541]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13701#comment-166170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not strictly  true as the Xbox one already has some direct x 12 functions and will get the full functions by the end of next year meaning that devs will jump right on it. PC that&#039;s a completely different area but from the material released current direct x 11 hardware will be capable of using some if not all Direct x 12 functions so its not that far off to be honest.

And by functions I mean APIS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not strictly  true as the Xbox one already has some direct x 12 functions and will get the full functions by the end of next year meaning that devs will jump right on it. PC that&#8217;s a completely different area but from the material released current direct x 11 hardware will be capable of using some if not all Direct x 12 functions so its not that far off to be honest.</p>
<p>And by functions I mean APIS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
