Comments on: 3.7.2014

By: Daemyr

Daemyr — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:52:17 +0000

Me too me too

By: Rubber Bubble Wrap Packaging Device Manufacturer’s Manual of Rubber Bubble Wrap Packaging Devices

Fri, 04 Jul 2014 13:45:20 +0000

32 bit applications can never use the full 4 GB RAM. However that doesn’t really matter as long as WoT doesn’t exceed the 32 bit memory limit.
And so far it doesn’t (for now) which is why there is no reason to put the extra work in a 64 bit client.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:53:44 +0000

That is most probable.
Many IS-3s were made from different companies and countries. So they will all be at least somewhat different.

By: loner85

loner85 — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:41:58 +0000

But it can be, I didn’t state anywhere that it is like that everytime. But you have to agree that there are more players using mods in higher tiers than in lower battle tiers.

By: Philuppus

Philuppus — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:08:38 +0000

I can’t use in-battle mods, too much impact on my already low fps. I really doubt 14/15 players in high tiers use mods at all.

By: Gav

Gav — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:01:41 +0000

The general consensus of the Japanese players on the topic of Japanese tanks is “Oh, you mean those things that got squashed by the Americans?” or “JGSDF tanks? Oh, the pieces of junks that Godzilla ate.”

Honestly, most Japanese players go for German tanks, and for good reason: They actually fought well in the war, and there’s a LOT of… STUFF (models, books, etc) for them.

By: Gav

Gav — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:47:44 +0000

Yo dawg, I heard y’all wanted HD models so we’re giving you pretty tanks but we’re nerfing their armor to be more “historical”, you dig?

By: Gav

Gav — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:43:04 +0000

IIRC, the Japanese favored night attacks, even in tank warfare. I’m sure there were several surprise attacks made at night in the European front as well.

I’m just hoping tier X tanks with IR equipment would get an advantage… Poor Patton could use a lot of love.

Stay the fuck away, T-62A. Nobody called you.

By: Gav

Gav — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:40:36 +0000

Soon™

By: Gav

Gav — Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:39:04 +0000

Problem with “new” Chinese tanks is that most of them were Soviet copies or didn’t exist at all. (LOL@Current tree) HOWEVER, it’ll be interesting to see amphibious tanks turned into tank destroyers (mostly for their shape, as WG has said explicitly that they won’t implement amphibious capability)
Hell, most of the current Chinese trees are post-war, and wartime tanks are lend-lease/captured. (Modified French, then modified British, then captured/modified Japanese, then modified American with Japanese gun, then lend-lease Russian with inferior stats) If you want to do like an international buffet tank, you can take the Vickers Mk. E Type B and give it a British chassis, German 37mm gun, Soviet T-26 turret, French Franklin engine, and Chinese crews.

Japan, at least, made their own tanks, and aside from mid/middle-high tier, they have most of the heavy tanks down. TDs are mostly going to be paper, IIRC.

As for the British, I’m guessing you haven’t read about the new MT/TD line at all…