<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: German Projects from Bundesarchiv</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168823</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 00:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually it would be &quot;Waffentraeger Aufsfuruhng Leichttraktor mit 8.8 cm PaK 45 L/130&quot;, but since that&#039;s such a mouthful, let&#039;s just call it the &quot;Waffletraktor&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it would be &#8220;Waffentraeger Aufsfuruhng Leichttraktor mit 8.8 cm PaK 45 L/130&#8243;, but since that&#8217;s such a mouthful, let&#8217;s just call it the &#8220;Waffletraktor&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loner85</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[loner85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguing by this logic, WoT should have only one Churchill in the game, since the other is basically just a turret modification (Churchill Mk. VII gained an improved hull).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguing by this logic, WoT should have only one Churchill in the game, since the other is basically just a turret modification (Churchill Mk. VII gained an improved hull).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loner85</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[loner85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 19:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tbh, I was calculating this in WG balancing, not real life :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tbh, I was calculating this in WG balancing, not real life :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaterTimeLord</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LaterTimeLord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 10:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm... I think a 11 meter gun in Berlin against an IS-3 isn&#039;t really a good idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; I think a 11 meter gun in Berlin against an IS-3 isn&#8217;t really a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaterTimeLord</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LaterTimeLord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 09:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The barrel pressure would be so much that it&#039;d break the barrel after approximately 50 shots? :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The barrel pressure would be so much that it&#8217;d break the barrel after approximately 50 shots? :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedShocktrooper</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RedShocktrooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 21:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to know what kind of projectile the 8.8cm L/130 would&#039;ve used. It couldn&#039;t have had much in the way of explosive charge in the APC shells, HE power would be terrible, and the APCR shots would overpenetrate every tank it might&#039;ve seen save maybe for the IS-3.

We know the Germans knew the IS-3 existed. Apparently there were ghost sightings of them in the closing months of the war. Perhaps the L/130 was developed to kill it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know what kind of projectile the 8.8cm L/130 would&#8217;ve used. It couldn&#8217;t have had much in the way of explosive charge in the APC shells, HE power would be terrible, and the APCR shots would overpenetrate every tank it might&#8217;ve seen save maybe for the IS-3.</p>
<p>We know the Germans knew the IS-3 existed. Apparently there were ghost sightings of them in the closing months of the war. Perhaps the L/130 was developed to kill it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legiondude</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legiondude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 20:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In reference to the 17 cm howitzer, because there’s already a 17 cm gun (a better one) on the Jagdpanzer E-100 &quot;

That IS the 17cm L/53, the only way it&#039;s &quot;better&quot; is that it doesn&#039;t have the 75mm &quot;weakspot&quot; above it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In reference to the 17 cm howitzer, because there’s already a 17 cm gun (a better one) on the Jagdpanzer E-100 &#8221;</p>
<p>That IS the 17cm L/53, the only way it&#8217;s &#8220;better&#8221; is that it doesn&#8217;t have the 75mm &#8220;weakspot&#8221; above it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delta0071</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Delta0071]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cause it&#039;s just a better armored E-100 turret? Anyway, that 8,8cm L/130 could be installed on sth. like a Jagdmaus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cause it&#8217;s just a better armored E-100 turret? Anyway, that 8,8cm L/130 could be installed on sth. like a Jagdmaus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiger313</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168533</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiger313]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 16:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohhh, right! O.o]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh, right! O.o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crash_core</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/04/german-projects-from-bundesarchiv/#comment-168525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crash_core]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=13919#comment-168525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[50 dmg per hit :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>50 dmg per hit :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
