Comments on: Bonusweb WG Interview: WoT 2.0 Considered

By: 23r0_NA

23r0_NA — Sun, 13 Jul 2014 00:23:23 +0000

It can’t if they insist on sticking to single-core graphics.

By: Mr. Perfect

Mr. Perfect — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 22:52:14 +0000

And what about all the premium tanks people bought? If that doesn’t transfer over at the very least, I’m not interested.

By: Mr. Perfect

Mr. Perfect — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 22:51:22 +0000

It’s done when it’s done.

By: Medjed

Medjed — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:31:22 +0000

Coming this century….maybe

By: Ludo787

Ludo787 — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 21:27:17 +0000

WoWP < WT < Il-2 Schturmovik 1946

By: RustyNail

RustyNail — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 20:11:27 +0000

If its true what WoT product manager said … I have to smile. … I have to smile very loudly.

WG is not able to adjust technical parameters of one single tank – Type 59 – to make it available for all players. And now some WoT manager claims that WoT as a game will be re-worked completely.

WG management is late several years with incorporation of reasonable suggestions of players to WoT, and now … they want to start from scratch again ???

Ok, WarThunder and Armored Warfare developers can organize big parties to celebrate such news from their competition.

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:22:45 +0000

There are more Call of Duty games sold then STALKER games sold.

Guess which one is better?

Hint: It aint deffinitiely CoD.

By: tiejng

tiejng — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:46:46 +0000

A successor of WoT will not happen, cannibalize a user base of an existing product that you own? This would be stupid, a new game is very costly and risky.

They will continue their thing, with great announcements, and then they don’t deliver in time (like havoc, release target was 9.1/9.2) and only evolve if they have to (if wt:gf didn’t exists, there were no HD models to be seen any time soon). As long they get away with that, they will continue this.

By: hue

hue — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 16:38:21 +0000

As much as I dislike WT’s wot-esque grindfest, I enjoy the gameplay, as it’s actually close to how real planes handle IRL (obviously, in Realistic and Aim, depending on how “updated” the FM is). I also enjoy the relatively realistic damaging.

As someone who has been with both WT and WoWP since alpha, I don’t understand how anyone can defend WOWP, besides as a free gold generator for WoT in tournaments. Planes in WOWP have absolutely nothing to do with reality, and the gameplay is objectively far worse (hello shovelware 360 arcade game stylings). I mean, goddamn, you don’t even have a cockpit view on ANY plane.

However, don’t take this as a defence of Gaijjin, they’re also horrible. They just made a better framework to fuck over the consumer on.

By: Tomasz Antochów

Tomasz Antochów — Sat, 12 Jul 2014 15:32:46 +0000

Maybe they won’t aim for the russians anymore? Maybe they will create a game aimed at North America/ Europe where( not always) people have at least half decent pcs? There are a lot of people to entertain and to get bucks from in EU/ USA. With making a new game with a new engine they will open up a whole new theatre of audience while maintaining the steady income of money from RU who are playing WoT.