<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 13.7.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firatstyler_EU</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Firatstyler_EU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still smaller then Aufkl. Panda, with better Hp/t]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still smaller then Aufkl. Panda, with better Hp/t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychocouac</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Psychocouac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh trust me it&#039;s as mobile as a Type 59. The acceleration phase is a bit hard maybe but after that it&#039;s nice. 

If you want a old but still good replay (in french): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbK-b22XmVw]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh trust me it&#8217;s as mobile as a Type 59. The acceleration phase is a bit hard maybe but after that it&#8217;s nice. </p>
<p>If you want a old but still good replay (in french): <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbK-b22XmVw" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbK-b22XmVw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JagdWehrwolf .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JagdWehrwolf .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It follows a dedicated scout/anti-scout, and judging by the leaks so far, it will precede a dedicated scout. So for crying out loud make it a bloody scout! What else there is to do? Now it&#039;s just a Panther, but worse, with it&#039;s sub-par gun and infinitely worse matchmaking. And don&#039;t get me started on a moron who thought &quot;Let&#039;s make it a battering ram on tracks! This will be fun!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It follows a dedicated scout/anti-scout, and judging by the leaks so far, it will precede a dedicated scout. So for crying out loud make it a bloody scout! What else there is to do? Now it&#8217;s just a Panther, but worse, with it&#8217;s sub-par gun and infinitely worse matchmaking. And don&#8217;t get me started on a moron who thought &#8220;Let&#8217;s make it a battering ram on tracks! This will be fun!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaver157</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beaver157]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would tend to agree with you. The people who complain about snipers just don&#039;t want to climb out of the comfort zone provided by their cushy, inaccurate Soviet heavies--or tanks ill-suited to ranged game-play. And while brawling as it is requires a great deal of quick thinking and instinct moves, it&#039;s often overlooked that the people who excel in this form of engagement lack the restraint, patience, and macroscopic tactical awareness crucial to being an effective sniper, artillery, or support vehicle. 

And referencing Perkele, &quot;Why don’t you go and play GF instead of wanting to make WoT what it’s not supposed to be&quot; -- War Thunder&#039;s Ground Forces provides a poor arena for ranged combat. There are few tanks in WTGF that can manage sniping even adequately, outside of which, the only way to destroy enemies is to seal-club bots, play large vehicles with the tendency to one-shot most other tanks, or play close ranged to be able to strike and weaken a tank with successive shots to the same point -- impossible from a distance with the game&#039;s spastic/&quot;realistic&quot; beta physics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to agree with you. The people who complain about snipers just don&#8217;t want to climb out of the comfort zone provided by their cushy, inaccurate Soviet heavies&#8211;or tanks ill-suited to ranged game-play. And while brawling as it is requires a great deal of quick thinking and instinct moves, it&#8217;s often overlooked that the people who excel in this form of engagement lack the restraint, patience, and macroscopic tactical awareness crucial to being an effective sniper, artillery, or support vehicle. </p>
<p>And referencing Perkele, &#8220;Why don’t you go and play GF instead of wanting to make WoT what it’s not supposed to be&#8221; &#8212; War Thunder&#8217;s Ground Forces provides a poor arena for ranged combat. There are few tanks in WTGF that can manage sniping even adequately, outside of which, the only way to destroy enemies is to seal-club bots, play large vehicles with the tendency to one-shot most other tanks, or play close ranged to be able to strike and weaken a tank with successive shots to the same point &#8212; impossible from a distance with the game&#8217;s spastic/&#8221;realistic&#8221; beta physics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsG_Alligator</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AsG_Alligator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 11:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Afk. Panther is a light tank allright, but its not a dedicated scout. It definitely should get normal tier VII matchmaker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Afk. Panther is a light tank allright, but its not a dedicated scout. It definitely should get normal tier VII matchmaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Similar mobility, same potential armament and sideskirts, all in a smaller package, what&#039;s not to love?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar mobility, same potential armament and sideskirts, all in a smaller package, what&#8217;s not to love?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 113</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[113]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFK panther was pretty fun on test server. dat ramming power...
All what they need to do, is change its MM. Give it regular T7 MM, and its fine]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFK panther was pretty fun on test server. dat ramming power&#8230;<br />
All what they need to do, is change its MM. Give it regular T7 MM, and its fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you want a bigger Elc AMX two tier higher?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you want a bigger Elc AMX two tier higher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFK 38d was pretty poorly armed, basically same as the Puma armored car.
There&#039;s a design of a Jagdpanzer 38 hull with a Panzer IV turret but it would be pretty slow, basically a tier V or VI stretching up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFK 38d was pretty poorly armed, basically same as the Puma armored car.<br />
There&#8217;s a design of a Jagdpanzer 38 hull with a Panzer IV turret but it would be pretty slow, basically a tier V or VI stretching up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Dragonov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/13/13-7-2014/#comment-171482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boris Dragonov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14336#comment-171482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i frankly don&#039;t want roaming!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i frankly don&#8217;t want roaming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
