<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swedish Tanks – Part XIII: EMIL 1952-1958</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more arties and autoloaders that will be broken...how awesome...not]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more arties and autoloaders that will be broken&#8230;how awesome&#8230;not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluech</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[all autoloaders have their clips artificially nerfed for gameplay reasons to 1/3 or 1/2 of their real clip size. The ROF would also be undoutibly be nerfed. they would have french esque armor and american mobility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all autoloaders have their clips artificially nerfed for gameplay reasons to 1/3 or 1/2 of their real clip size. The ROF would also be undoutibly be nerfed. they would have french esque armor and american mobility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IN33DAMM0</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IN33DAMM0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m super excited for these Swedish tanks. I hope WG puts the exact ones you found and did research on, in game. They look like they could swap shells with an tank in WoT currently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m super excited for these Swedish tanks. I hope WG puts the exact ones you found and did research on, in game. They look like they could swap shells with an tank in WoT currently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Szepie Law</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szepie Law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so with similar stats and look of amx 50b......?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so with similar stats and look of amx 50b&#8230;&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beaver157</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172121</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beaver157]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...cancellation of the project in January 1957, before the constructed prototype reached full operational status and could be tested. No photos of the assembled prototype T57 with 120mm gun have survived.&quot;

On the T57 Heavy Tank]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;cancellation of the project in January 1957, before the constructed prototype reached full operational status and could be tested. No photos of the assembled prototype T57 with 120mm gun have survived.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the T57 Heavy Tank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[.....
did you even take a look at te article?
two prototypes were constructed, and besides there is plenty of things that could be done to balance them. i just chose to compare the line to the american one since they have simmilar overall characteristics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;..<br />
did you even take a look at te article?<br />
two prototypes were constructed, and besides there is plenty of things that could be done to balance them. i just chose to compare the line to the american one since they have simmilar overall characteristics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172027</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;One thing of note is that the 150mm gun is not viable for World of Tanks, as it is a smoothbore&quot; maybe you should pay more attention to what you read. we wont get the 15cm gun, instead we will get the 12cm and 10,5cm guns]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One thing of note is that the 150mm gun is not viable for World of Tanks, as it is a smoothbore&#8221; maybe you should pay more attention to what you read. we wont get the 15cm gun, instead we will get the 12cm and 10,5cm guns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meneldil</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172026</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meneldil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As if T54E1 and T57 heavy weren&#039;t already fucking OP and completely outclassing their french equivalents (who, unlike the Americans and this swedish monstruosity, went past the wooden mockup stage).

In order to not be insane, this tank would have to have completely gimped soft stats, which isn&#039;t going to happen, given the two years long powercreep. So what we&#039;ll get is another tier X autoloader that will chew  AMX50 120 and 50B for breakfast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if T54E1 and T57 heavy weren&#8217;t already fucking OP and completely outclassing their french equivalents (who, unlike the Americans and this swedish monstruosity, went past the wooden mockup stage).</p>
<p>In order to not be insane, this tank would have to have completely gimped soft stats, which isn&#8217;t going to happen, given the two years long powercreep. So what we&#8217;ll get is another tier X autoloader that will chew  AMX50 120 and 50B for breakfast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nekommando</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nekommando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s the gun. Autoloaded 15cm is just too much for tier 10, let alone T9.

Autoloaded 120mm is also insane.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the gun. Autoloaded 15cm is just too much for tier 10, let alone T9.</p>
<p>Autoloaded 120mm is also insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Doge</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/#comment-172011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[General Doge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14405#comment-172011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This big gun? Nah it&#039;s a crane you see!

We are sneaky like that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This big gun? Nah it&#8217;s a crane you see!</p>
<p>We are sneaky like that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
