Comments on: The M.11/39 – ‘Not the Worst tank of the War’ http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Slayer Jesse http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172425 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:39:35 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172425 Dude, it’s a joke. though i never thought i’d get to use it for that exact model :D

]]> By: Wolfie http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172406 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:42:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172406 I doubt anyone would take it as a serious source (you never know though.)

A good article as always, Vollketten. Really love the work you do on Italian tanks (the lack of appreciation for them is at times, depressing.) I’ve been hoping for awhile that you would do one on the M11/39.

]]> By: Vollketten http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172384 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:36:09 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172384 Probably not a good idea to reply on that as a source of information about the performance of any tank. Especially as its a load of rubbish.

]]> By: 23r0_NA http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172352 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 19:00:42 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172352 Basically it would be an analogue to the AT-1 with the 76 mm gun (the fact that other people completely forget about the other ‘derp TD’ at tier 2 says a lot about the T18)

]]> By: Wolfie http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172339 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:47:44 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172339 I remember that episode. Hehehe.

The reason the M11 had a main gun in the hull was due to not being able to fit it in the turret. Although I will admit that it does look cool (even if impractical.) in the hull.

I’d imagine that using the 37 mm L/40 would be similar to playing a tank destroyer.

]]> By: Slayer Jesse http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172182 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:48:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172182 http://youtu.be/F5Yf9LapL-M?t=2m56s
you know you have a problem when the Japanese make fun of how bad your tanks are.

]]> By: Wolfie http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172158 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:21:01 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172158 It looks like a pretty interesting tank, even if it has it’s faults. Maybe players could alternate between the turret machine guns and hull main gun (with the machine guns they have more mobility but lesser damage, and with the 37 mm L/40, they can pack a punch but with limited mobility/tranverse.)

I think it would work very well as a Tier II medium, in any case.

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172106 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:21:58 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172106 Suspension is based on the Vickers 6 ton so no wonder it’s very similar…

]]> By: SunnyBittern http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172097 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:17:24 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172097 Suspension looks identical.

]]> By: Dexter5021 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/the-m-1139-not-the-worst-tank-of-the-war/#comment-172003 Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:59:36 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14392#comment-172003 In the first pic, if you remove the turret, it looks like the AT-1 http://i.imgur.com/mHGOyCL.jpg

]]>