campaign tanks are really easy to get if you take the time.

“We don’t even balance!”

- basically, regarding the point above, Storm confirms that a tank, that gets spotted on the open field will never disappear, unless it drives behind an obstacle (a bush) or out of view range

This means: “active scouts will suffer.” O.K. :@

- regarding the UI, introducing garage dynamic tank characteristics in garage is “much more complicated than introducing a reload timer”

“… It needs 2 algorithms. Reload needed one.”

Maus is terrible, I want WG to think hard about how OP a maus would be with a 8 second reload. Oh… it still moves at the rate a black hole decays, so it really wouldn’t matter but atleast its reload matches it’s gigantic turret

IS-4 is largely worse than the ST-1 in its current state. Not that bad on its own, but beaten by its predecessor.

Same deal with the FV304.
You have 2 people playing it: people who find it fun, who sifted through the entire game (therefore are better and more experienced) to find it, or people who are masochist enough to play arty and British at the same time.

Tell that to my tier 4 TD the American T40 that has shot and damaged tanks at 684m that I documented and other tanks that I’ve surely damaged a tank at or above 700m.

I stopped tracking the high range shots after a while but I consider them a part of the game so if you clip my draw distance at 565 meters and keep me from sniping things in the 566-707m view range you are reducing my maximum draw range.

I’ll agree that it makes sense to limit the draw range until the server load issue is fixed by the to be developed code but I’d like to see the draw range circle start out at 565m now and move to 600m later and then to 700m after that (knowing that it might be a year or two for such a change to occur).

http://imgur.com/KCGJW48