Comments on: The Chieftain as Tier 10

By: _Reaper

_Reaper — Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:47:09 +0000

And have you not thought about the fact this tans armour is most likely created differently hence the measuring devices used may give incorrect results?

You also would take the Russian’s schematic as true? ever heard of propaganda?

By: Theodosius

Theodosius — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:28:31 +0000

It’s tier10 T29 IMHO.

By: taurua

taurua — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:25:07 +0000

Please coming soonnnnnnnnnnnnnn.Only this can save the QUEEN.

By: Johnson

Johnson — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:21:28 +0000

What exactly IS high priority after the firefly branch? They’ve basically said everything not german or russian is “low priority” at this point. This includes japanese/chinese lines that dont exist yet and stuff like second french/american heavy/medium lines. Not to mention the ever pushed back EU tree.

Fuckin WG swear to god after firefly we’re just gonna get another russian heavy line or something.

By: Theodosius

Theodosius — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:18:20 +0000

Its armor will be fine when hull down, but no way near T110E3 since the weight is much lighter.

By: sheckerol

sheckerol — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:11:18 +0000

moar grammar

By: AppyRose

AppyRose — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:34:59 +0000

I agree, why not both?
215b and Chieftain (my choice P6)
Side by side both at tier 10. The 215b has it’s fans, it exists in this game, and a lot of work has went into it. A second tier 10 British heavy, just means more grinding and the equals more revenue for Wargaming.
Win-Win.
Appy

By: Hakzi

Hakzi — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 18:05:37 +0000

Ignore it because we can divide this made up thing into subcategories…
FIRSTLY: There are of course the completely fake, made up tanks

http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/01/07/its-a-fake-part-2-wargaming-fakes/ <- (i just found smthng on the internet, i was too lazy to dig further, but I guess you dont have ~10 fingers on 1 hand)

SECONDLY: then there are tanks with fake configuration.. Hi IS-4…and i would put the fv215b here (but i want to HIGHLIGHT that this is my opinion, the reason why i would put the FV215b(120) here is that the hull existed, the turret existed, the gun existed).
I'm not saying that i am right, or my idea is the good one, but i think the FV215B should stay in the game, not because unhistorical tanks have place in an ARCADE GAME, but because it still brings something unique (i consider rear turreted tanks unique, as well as autoloaders)

By: Vally

Vally — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:23:52 +0000

so you get.. uhh.. conqueror? :D

By: xidex

xidex — Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:26:41 +0000

“- the armor of the vehicle was worse than expected and by no means it’s as OP as everyone thinks”
So those russian schematics have to be wrong or P6 is a lot more different than Mk.1 because if P6 would have armor like on those schematics I dont think it is weak or what. UFP 275 EA, plate above mantlet 250 EA but yes there may be some zones with very thin armor just sayin