<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: T32 Weasel &#8211; Possible US tier 2 TD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 10:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1mm hull?

HARDCORE LU BU MODE ENGAGED]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1mm hull?</p>
<p>HARDCORE LU BU MODE ENGAGED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 22:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would work, the WT E-100 has zero rear turret armor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would work, the WT E-100 has zero rear turret armor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMG this thing rocks. Its like a Mk103 but actually far superior ballistics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG this thing rocks. Its like a Mk103 but actually far superior ballistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck_Rogers</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck_Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 20:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WG could theoretically use the T32 Weasel as a basis for a T18 replacement.

The Weasel did carry a 37mm M3 on Iwo Jima - but just as a transport.

However there were many attempts at mounting 37mm M3 guns on Jeeps. If the Jeep could do it, I think the Weasel could as well. In reality both vehicles would be heavily overloaded, but a 37mm M3 Weasel would be more historically accurate than some things.

That would allow for two gun choices at least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WG could theoretically use the T32 Weasel as a basis for a T18 replacement.</p>
<p>The Weasel did carry a 37mm M3 on Iwo Jima &#8211; but just as a transport.</p>
<p>However there were many attempts at mounting 37mm M3 guns on Jeeps. If the Jeep could do it, I think the Weasel could as well. In reality both vehicles would be heavily overloaded, but a 37mm M3 Weasel would be more historically accurate than some things.</p>
<p>That would allow for two gun choices at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumblyjack .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bumblyjack .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. Use this as a replacement for T18.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. Use this as a replacement for T18.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adjutant</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adjutant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked your other T18 replacement suggestion better.  Also, the gun is on a tripod, I don&#039;t think WG would go with something weird like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked your other T18 replacement suggestion better.  Also, the gun is on a tripod, I don&#8217;t think WG would go with something weird like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kauris Azurai</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kauris Azurai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The t57 should be the tier 2 TD. it was actually the TD. and it wouldn&#039;t make a bad one either, it has some armour. good speed.

The t18 as a tier 2 arty is hilarious. maybe tier 3. XD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The t57 should be the tier 2 TD. it was actually the TD. and it wouldn&#8217;t make a bad one either, it has some armour. good speed.</p>
<p>The t18 as a tier 2 arty is hilarious. maybe tier 3. XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xoden</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xoden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More like a Tier I tank destroyer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More like a Tier I tank destroyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRSanchez</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IRSanchez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s just an idea. It as could well get some other gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just an idea. It as could well get some other gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFrog (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/18/t32-weasel-possible-us-tier-2-td/#comment-173538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ClassicFrog (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14490#comment-173538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tier 2 td that can&#039;t reliably damage tier 2 tanks with standard ammo? It could be THE fastest tank in the game, but it would also be one of the more pointless ones.

Pretty much meh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tier 2 td that can&#8217;t reliably damage tier 2 tanks with standard ammo? It could be THE fastest tank in the game, but it would also be one of the more pointless ones.</p>
<p>Pretty much meh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
