<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 19.7.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Kujou</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Kujou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how about German Patton tanks...? IIRC the M48A1 has 90mm and might work for a premium VIII]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how about German Patton tanks&#8230;? IIRC the M48A1 has 90mm and might work for a premium VIII</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alive n kickin'</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alive n kickin']]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[5k is needed for posting access to special subforum (where devs answering), for regular it is like on eu forum (50battles).
One could probably buy some 5k acc, it shouldnt be that expensive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5k is needed for posting access to special subforum (where devs answering), for regular it is like on eu forum (50battles).<br />
One could probably buy some 5k acc, it shouldnt be that expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackiechan57</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackiechan57]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 01:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it was I am wondering if the 20 pounder could&#039;ve been mounted in it too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it was I am wondering if the 20 pounder could&#8217;ve been mounted in it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daigensui</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daigensui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 10:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, that is the Japanese designation for its own modified L7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that is the Japanese designation for its own modified L7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daigensui</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daigensui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because just about every retard don&#039;t realize that Vickers is a Centurionized Chieftain with superior fire control.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because just about every retard don&#8217;t realize that Vickers is a Centurionized Chieftain with superior fire control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comstedt</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[comstedt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 07:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Def needs buff, only 66% winrate in it :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Def needs buff, only 66% winrate in it :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TankaTed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TankaTed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 01:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[5000 battles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5000 battles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yurra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 22:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is only a small useless strip of it on the sides while it&#039;s supposed to be like on soviet tanks, check their armor layout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only a small useless strip of it on the sides while it&#8217;s supposed to be like on soviet tanks, check their armor layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yurra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FV4202 already has almost equal view range, a lower profile and better camo, better mobility and after the buff it will have better DPM than the Fatton. M48 needs its 7.5 RPM back, it has similar gun handling to STB-1 and Rusky meds have close to 3000 DPM with railgun status so it really shouldn&#039;t be a problem.

Also Foch 155 needs a reload and gun handling buff, FV 183 needs to have HESH removed and gun handling buffed, Obj 268 needs shell velocity buffed and maybe a buff to terrain passability, 113 needs a bit more RoF and better passability, T57 needs a reload time nerf, WT E-100 needs to be removed from the game and replaced with something that ain&#039;t made up and game breaking. Period.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FV4202 already has almost equal view range, a lower profile and better camo, better mobility and after the buff it will have better DPM than the Fatton. M48 needs its 7.5 RPM back, it has similar gun handling to STB-1 and Rusky meds have close to 3000 DPM with railgun status so it really shouldn&#8217;t be a problem.</p>
<p>Also Foch 155 needs a reload and gun handling buff, FV 183 needs to have HESH removed and gun handling buffed, Obj 268 needs shell velocity buffed and maybe a buff to terrain passability, 113 needs a bit more RoF and better passability, T57 needs a reload time nerf, WT E-100 needs to be removed from the game and replaced with something that ain&#8217;t made up and game breaking. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JagdWehrwolf .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/#comment-174045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JagdWehrwolf .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2014 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14537#comment-174045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well... No shit, Sherlock. Now, when it&#039;s clear that both can carry the same gun, we&#039;d like to know why Vickers MBT trumps Action X.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; No shit, Sherlock. Now, when it&#8217;s clear that both can carry the same gun, we&#8217;d like to know why Vickers MBT trumps Action X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
