Comments on: 23.7.2014

By: Drakko

Drakko — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:53:49 +0000

Well, seems we’re on the same page with that. Yes, that’s the explanation why some people(myself included) call that thing the iD10T gun(to make it more obvious).

And yeah, you got the point exactly. It won’t be pulling those BS maneuvers, however it’s only trading alpha for way better everything else: aimtime, precision, rof, profitability, gold ammo performance(keep in mind the gold ammo from the 122 D25 (and variations)is shit – 217 pen, the D10T fires it’s APCR at 235 pen)

By: Eiskonig_001

Eiskonig_001 — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:52:58 +0000

“- the date of third CW campaign won’t be disclosed for now”.
Just wanted to point out that it’s the 4th campaign (1st one was M60, 2nd was VK7201k, 3rd was the T23e3)

By: Golem501

Golem501 — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 08:23:27 +0000

A tank without a gun? That would just leave ramming… while fun, not very fair if the other tanks still have guns…

By: JPK

JPK — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 04:44:44 +0000

So we will probably end with a tank mounting gun (100mm) with superior parameters to both 75 and 88, nice.

By: loner85

loner85 — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 01:15:52 +0000

Yea, and SU-101 works because camo and higher alpha damage…sorry, but your argument fails. Also it bounces low-tier shots like crazy.

By: Fischer

Fischer — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:52:11 +0000

Are you, by any chance, an alter ego of a user called ‘Random Sniper’?

By: Landric

Landric — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:45:38 +0000

I’m not someone that thinks the 1S is OP (though I did until I got one, then I learned how to fight one). However, if we accept that a nerf was needed, I think this would have been a great solution:

-Nerf gun depression to -5 or -6, whatever the IS with the 122mm has
-Nerf alpha to 340, pen to 160, and accuracy to .48
-Leave all other stats the same, reload time, mobility, armor, propensity to catch fire, etc.

There are plenty of guns in the game of the same caliber that do different amounts of damage, there is no reason the first available 122mm couldn’t simply do less damage and have less pen. That would make the D-25T on the IS a substantial improvement, faster ROF plus more alpha and pen. All one gets from upgrading from the D-2-5T on the IS to the D-25T at the moment is a faster rate of fire.

By: Septfox Malkier

Septfox Malkier — Thu, 24 Jul 2014 00:04:43 +0000

He’s talking about the 100mm D10T some of the higher Soviet tanks can get.

Look at the designation: D10T. Switch the numbers for similar-looking letters: DIOT. Add an i to the beginning: iDIOT.

Thus, 100mm iDIOT gun. It’s not a bad gun or anything (arguably it’s actually quite a good gun at tier 7 on the IS because of its accuracy, firerate and shell cost compared to the 122), it just has an unfortunate model number.

And, I share the concern about a tier 6 having an D10T…though at least it won’t be pulling off bullshit snap oneshots/crippling 3/4hp shots as the current 122 does. Curious to see how they’ll balance it against the 107 on the T-150.

By: Kono Reizei

Kono Reizei — Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:50:00 +0000

You’re right, the SU-100 is faster, has more armor and gets the same gun with a lower profile. It’s not OP, you just suck at the game.

By: loner85

loner85 — Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:19:06 +0000

What retard are you then? Calling Wargaming Stalin-regime but your username says “Say no to islam”? You must have quite…a view on what happens in the world right now.

I want you banned for intolerance and ignorance though.