<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 24.7.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.T.</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.T.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wrong T-100, dude. I asked for the light tank T-100.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong T-100, dude. I asked for the light tank T-100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KurriKlown</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KurriKlown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+2 still need that elusive bastard as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+2 still need that elusive bastard as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavel_p</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pavel_p]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 08:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it worse than obj430, Chinese one or fv4202? Just asking, because meds I mentioned are even more rare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it worse than obj430, Chinese one or fv4202? Just asking, because meds I mentioned are even more rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperSpy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperSpy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 07:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any ETA for patch 9.2 ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any ETA for patch 9.2 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeanutFly</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PeanutFly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s clearly because of the issues with the stronk translatorering! Needs more grorious Soviet bias in it to properly work! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s clearly because of the issues with the stronk translatorering! Needs more grorious Soviet bias in it to properly work! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauschen04</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauschen04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My guess is SerB worried that turning  the tank around would increase the potential for repeated hits on that track.

Or it&#039;s bugged and the detracking module somehow tabulates that the tank moving around on one track is enough to cause damage.

Or it could increase track armor abuse if you could trim your tank out as you&#039;re detracked. It would make the benefit of aiming for the tracks pointless when you plug the first shot in a fast moving track, he spins to his broadside and immediately starts reversing to orient his glacis or cover his weakpoints at you during your reload - you maybe get one shot into his side and find a perfectly sidescraped trim of a superheavy tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is SerB worried that turning  the tank around would increase the potential for repeated hits on that track.</p>
<p>Or it&#8217;s bugged and the detracking module somehow tabulates that the tank moving around on one track is enough to cause damage.</p>
<p>Or it could increase track armor abuse if you could trim your tank out as you&#8217;re detracked. It would make the benefit of aiming for the tracks pointless when you plug the first shot in a fast moving track, he spins to his broadside and immediately starts reversing to orient his glacis or cover his weakpoints at you during your reload &#8211; you maybe get one shot into his side and find a perfectly sidescraped trim of a superheavy tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauschen04</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauschen04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 05:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe a different team developed it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a different team developed it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KoD_FireDancer SEA SEVER</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KoD_FireDancer SEA SEVER]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 03:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont have the T57. So let me tell you this. the armor is weak as f**k. Just shoot the big ass turret, point the cross hair to it&#039;s gun and RNG do the job =]] Work every time =]]

P/s: My Ing-lit is so awesome]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont have the T57. So let me tell you this. the armor is weak as f**k. Just shoot the big ass turret, point the cross hair to it&#8217;s gun and RNG do the job =]] Work every time =]]</p>
<p>P/s: My Ing-lit is so awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TankaTed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TankaTed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current premium recovery system is complete shit anyways, the old one was better since you had plenty  of time to restore it if you wanted to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current premium recovery system is complete shit anyways, the old one was better since you had plenty  of time to restore it if you wanted to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loner85</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/24/24-7-2014/#comment-175792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[loner85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=14667#comment-175792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because that is a huge and multi-turreted design, would likely go under &quot;OP&quot;, or better &quot;UP&quot;, since it could only use a (historically at least) 7.62cm L-11, and probably only that single turret, armor would be basically either non-existant or KV-1-like, dunno, depends on the tier it would be placed. Could make its way as premium though, KV-5 is also multiturret, why not T-100 as T4 prem heavy or lower? Kind of a lowtier KV-5, crap guns, adequate armor and such.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because that is a huge and multi-turreted design, would likely go under &#8220;OP&#8221;, or better &#8220;UP&#8221;, since it could only use a (historically at least) 7.62cm L-11, and probably only that single turret, armor would be basically either non-existant or KV-1-like, dunno, depends on the tier it would be placed. Could make its way as premium though, KV-5 is also multiturret, why not T-100 as T4 prem heavy or lower? Kind of a lowtier KV-5, crap guns, adequate armor and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
