Comments on: 28.7.2014

By: eblingus

eblingus — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:55:50 +0000

““…generally weak armor of these vehicles is fully compensated by their massive firepower. ”
I really hate this design philosophy in WoT, where OP firepower is supposedly compensated by poor armor or reload time. It reminds me of the saying that a man with one foot in a bucket of boiling hot water, and the other foot in a bucket of freezing cold water, is on average, quite comfortable.
I don’t care how ‘balanced’ these tanks are when averaged out over thousands of battles and thousands of players, when I get one-shoted with no chance to reply, it just sucks. So what if my team, through some miracle, strikes back and punishes my killer? I still get a big fat repair bill, a trip to the garage, and a bad feeling for facing OP tanks.
WG has all kinds of excuses on why things work in WoT, counter to RL and historical accuracy, for the sake of gameplay. Fine, got it. When are they going to get OP alpha strikes suck for gameplay?

By: Skarakien

Skarakien — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:40:40 +0000

After all the RNGs already in the game you bitch about random generated maps?
Exo logic. :)

By: Warstore

Warstore — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 07:52:42 +0000

So, you wanted it to not be on top for damage dealt, despite the fact that it was built for the sole purpose of dealing damage? Which tank you wanted to be on top? The E3, which can also soak a shit ton of damage?

By: theacehamster

theacehamster — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:01:27 +0000

Quick addendum, GWE100, if it is sitting, better than waffle sitting, Firing about the same as waffle sitting

By: theacehamster

theacehamster — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 05:42:32 +0000

I am sorry, OP cammo on the WTE100. Lets just review that particular statement

From the last time I did the calculations of the figures, a tank with a 350m view range will spot the stationary WTE100 in the open at 348.8m.
The Maus, largest production tank ever, in the the open, spotting tank with a 350m view range, 345.8m
In fact, with the exception of the Maus and the E100, you will see the WTE100 sitting in the open, not moving, not firing BEFORE any other tank in the game, even when those tanks are firing upon you and moving around.
Now, how OP is that

I will admit that the figures that I have are about 6 months old, but last time I checked, there hasn’t been a buff to TD Cammo in that time.
Please check your facts before you make such sweeping statements Dead_Zombie.

P.S. If anyone has updated cammo percentages, let me know so I can update my own calculations

By: Rocri

Rocri — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 05:32:17 +0000

Dude the WTaufE100 have bad cammo, almost as bad as Jpz E100. It’s not the klingonian RHM.

By: Deflex

Deflex — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:23:43 +0000

I absolutely agree. :)

By: Donkey_

Donkey_ — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 21:14:17 +0000

And just tier 9 meds… :/
this times were so good :(

By: Dead_Zombie

Dead_Zombie — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:26:41 +0000

Ares354 (shoe size, IQ and Age) – sthu 44% pubbie. I happen to have one, and know that its camo is OP (until u fire of course, just like any tanks). You on the other hand, are obviously still stuck at tier 2 since you know nothing. Finally, you may want to make sure you get pasted 2nd grade english class before you post on the forums.

By: gundamhisoka

gundamhisoka — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:19:42 +0000

tier 10 tds are op imo, i tell anyone who is serious about tier 10 gameplay to get a tier 10 td.
yesterday Westfield i was shooting this poor E-100 first shot was 938(max damage for T110E3) and wasn’t spotted even though i wasn’t hidden properly. poor guy got melted by me