Comments on: “How XVM was created” – Part 2

By: jakub_czyli_ja

jakub_czyli_ja — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:23:16 +0000

Maybe because it’s easier to handle JSON in ActionScript?

By: “How XVM was created” – Part 3 | For The Record

“How XVM was created” – Part 3 | For The Record — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:31:46 +0000

[...] Part 1: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/26/how-xvm-was-created-part-1/ Part 2: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/28/how-xvm-was-created-part-2/ [...]

By: OOPMan

OOPMan — Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:20:31 +0000

One wonders why they bothered developing JSONx when YAML allows for a lot of the complicated features they desired…

By: jakub_czyli_ja

jakub_czyli_ja — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:09:37 +0000

Vim with javascript syntax.
Also I’ve put configs to git, then after each update and dropping new config files onto old, I see all changes just like that.

By: Kieron Earl

Kieron Earl — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:06:13 +0000

+1 for the notepad++ FTW comment, always use it to update my mods

By: nixxxie

nixxxie — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:53:19 +0000

Yep, even currently online editor is not up to date – and i doubt it will ever be again, because the stuff you can do with extraFields is too much to close it in a number of options to pick. Maybe they will choose some simple ones with HP bars on ears but it will be nothing to what you can achieve editing by hand – notepad++ FTW ;) .

By: r

Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:59:00 +0000

I actually remember installing OTM in 0.6.7 (after that the 7.0 fucked it up, like every major WG update). Weird I thought it existed much longer before.

By: PhiliPTran

PhiliPTran — Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:42:42 +0000

Just wait till WG implements every mod available to the game except xvm.

I personally like this history bit on xvm and mods, anymore writeups coming?