<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Outta Supertest &#8211; Object 430 Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultrasonic2</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ultrasonic2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 03:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[can i have the English version of this post ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i have the English version of this post ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polemarchos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polemarchos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 03:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that they should drop the M48 Patton in favor of the M60. Another reason, besides the ones you gave, would be if you compared the technology involved across all tier X mediums in the game, you&#039;re actually pitting the M48 Patton, developed in the mid to late 50s, against tanks developed in the 60s, and even the 70s if you include the STB-1... They could even make the M48 a tier 8 premium medium...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they should drop the M48 Patton in favor of the M60. Another reason, besides the ones you gave, would be if you compared the technology involved across all tier X mediums in the game, you&#8217;re actually pitting the M48 Patton, developed in the mid to late 50s, against tanks developed in the 60s, and even the 70s if you include the STB-1&#8230; They could even make the M48 a tier 8 premium medium&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1n_Soviet_Russia</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184639</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1n_Soviet_Russia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate to say it but the 62A and the 140 will ALWAYS be better for a skilled player as the more accurate guns will mean better kiting enemy with vision control and camo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to say it but the 62A and the 140 will ALWAYS be better for a skilled player as the more accurate guns will mean better kiting enemy with vision control and camo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: majiger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[majiger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL RUNNING EQUIPS THAT ARE DIFFERENT!

Ya. Compensating a tank&#039;s weakness with equips = being a noob.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL RUNNING EQUIPS THAT ARE DIFFERENT!</p>
<p>Ya. Compensating a tank&#8217;s weakness with equips = being a noob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoyM18</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RoyM18]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the M48 although it could need some &quot;special&quot; skill. Ie. better accuraty or better hulldown possibilities. Atm. 372 battles and 2,8k dmg/battle. 140 is at 149 games with 3,75k/battle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the M48 although it could need some &#8220;special&#8221; skill. Ie. better accuraty or better hulldown possibilities. Atm. 372 battles and 2,8k dmg/battle. 140 is at 149 games with 3,75k/battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoimen Bardarov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen Bardarov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be honest for a while I had 6000+ on my Leo, but I had also just a single game in it. Now at 500 battles it&#039;s 2.5k :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest for a while I had 6000+ on my Leo, but I had also just a single game in it. Now at 500 battles it&#8217;s 2.5k :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoimen Bardarov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen Bardarov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has ARMOUR, not just cupola]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has ARMOUR, not just cupola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macmac</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macmac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHAT A FUCK.!!!! LEAVE ALONE OBJECT 430 wtf FAKING NERF AGAIN they want to nerf his accuracy LOOOL 1 think hi is god in its sniping cos of camo and now they reducing accuracy so hi cant do this well and incase reload .. gues what ... hi dond ned beter reload cos hi SNIPING now hi will penetrate or even hit 1/2 shots from 400 + meters.... now its god becaouse of best med camo . and if they nerf camo ... i think i will stay on ob 416]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT A FUCK.!!!! LEAVE ALONE OBJECT 430 wtf FAKING NERF AGAIN they want to nerf his accuracy LOOOL 1 think hi is god in its sniping cos of camo and now they reducing accuracy so hi cant do this well and incase reload .. gues what &#8230; hi dond ned beter reload cos hi SNIPING now hi will penetrate or even hit 1/2 shots from 400 + meters&#8230;. now its god becaouse of best med camo . and if they nerf camo &#8230; i think i will stay on ob 416</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Marcus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Marcus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Just means you can’t run Optics/Rammer/GLD. Probably Optics/GLD/V.Stab to compensate for shit accuracy&quot;

LOL NOOB ALERT]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just means you can’t run Optics/Rammer/GLD. Probably Optics/GLD/V.Stab to compensate for shit accuracy&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL NOOB ALERT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: majiger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/20/straight-outta-supertest-object-430-change/#comment-184318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[majiger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 05:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=15856#comment-184318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has -5 gun depression from 45 degrees left to right.

People should get their shit straight when complaining about tanks.

It has -1 gun depression when aiming over the engine deck. 

The thing it doesn&#039;t have is turret abuse compared to the 62A but it&#039;s frontal armor is still relevant no matter what you say.

Having a comparable DPM might finally make it a better contender but that accuracy nerf even further sucks balls :\

Just means you can&#039;t run Optics/Rammer/GLD. Probably Optics/GLD/V.Stab to compensate for shit accuracy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has -5 gun depression from 45 degrees left to right.</p>
<p>People should get their shit straight when complaining about tanks.</p>
<p>It has -1 gun depression when aiming over the engine deck. </p>
<p>The thing it doesn&#8217;t have is turret abuse compared to the 62A but it&#8217;s frontal armor is still relevant no matter what you say.</p>
<p>Having a comparable DPM might finally make it a better contender but that accuracy nerf even further sucks balls :\</p>
<p>Just means you can&#8217;t run Optics/Rammer/GLD. Probably Optics/GLD/V.Stab to compensate for shit accuracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
