<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 27.8.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeLuXo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeLuXo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good job opening your reply with an insult, very mature.

And then there&#039;s the point of there not being a coherent line. Have you looked at the American auto-loader line!?

You have the M2/M3/M5 light tank line, the M7 was designed as replacement for the M5, but is a medium tank in a line that is nothing but light tanks up until tier 8. 
After that you get a tank that is completely unrelated to any other tank in the line and which, frankly, should be on the other side of the tech tree (before the T20 most reasonably). 
Both previous tanks were cancelled before they were put into production, and were succeded by the M24 Chaffee, which is in the other light tank branch. 
After the T21 (which should be just as much a medium as the M7) you get the T71, an autoloader tank designed to be airmobile (which was also a requirement for the M41, but it got too heavy). Not to mention that the T71 is a mix between 2 projects, as per WG fashion.
After the T71 there would be 2 more viable light tanks (T92 and (X)M551), but WG decided to suddenly make this an auto-loader branch.
The T69 has nothing at all to do with the T71 other than that it happens to have an auto-loader.
The T54E1 was a heavy gun tank (105 mm gun), the only existant T54E1 in the world has a sign next to it saying &quot;Heavy Tank&quot;, yet WG decides it&#039;s a medium tank somehow.

Please, don&#039;t talk about coherency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job opening your reply with an insult, very mature.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the point of there not being a coherent line. Have you looked at the American auto-loader line!?</p>
<p>You have the M2/M3/M5 light tank line, the M7 was designed as replacement for the M5, but is a medium tank in a line that is nothing but light tanks up until tier 8.<br />
After that you get a tank that is completely unrelated to any other tank in the line and which, frankly, should be on the other side of the tech tree (before the T20 most reasonably).<br />
Both previous tanks were cancelled before they were put into production, and were succeded by the M24 Chaffee, which is in the other light tank branch.<br />
After the T21 (which should be just as much a medium as the M7) you get the T71, an autoloader tank designed to be airmobile (which was also a requirement for the M41, but it got too heavy). Not to mention that the T71 is a mix between 2 projects, as per WG fashion.<br />
After the T71 there would be 2 more viable light tanks (T92 and (X)M551), but WG decided to suddenly make this an auto-loader branch.<br />
The T69 has nothing at all to do with the T71 other than that it happens to have an auto-loader.<br />
The T54E1 was a heavy gun tank (105 mm gun), the only existant T54E1 in the world has a sign next to it saying &#8220;Heavy Tank&#8221;, yet WG decides it&#8217;s a medium tank somehow.</p>
<p>Please, don&#8217;t talk about coherency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixxxie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nixxxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;&gt; - apparently, if a bot plays better than a player would, Storm does not see the issue in having such a bot in battle

Like, really?
I&#039;m paying to play against humans and the only thing that counts is my belief that i still play against humans only. If it&#039;s gone, i&#039;m gone too. 
I don&#039;t care if i&#039;m better or worse than computer - why should i? If i want to play against machine i have plenty of singleplayer games...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; &#8211; apparently, if a bot plays better than a player would, Storm does not see the issue in having such a bot in battle</p>
<p>Like, really?<br />
I&#8217;m paying to play against humans and the only thing that counts is my belief that i still play against humans only. If it&#8217;s gone, i&#8217;m gone too.<br />
I don&#8217;t care if i&#8217;m better or worse than computer &#8211; why should i? If i want to play against machine i have plenty of singleplayer games&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hemanathan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hemanathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 15:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[welp i only play with 55+ or 2000+ recent/overall, mostly unica cos pubs are cancer, so technically i can&#039;t be. also my recent has been 60+ 2000+ for a few months, scrubby but gud enough compared to random pubbie kthxbai]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>welp i only play with 55+ or 2000+ recent/overall, mostly unica cos pubs are cancer, so technically i can&#8217;t be. also my recent has been 60+ 2000+ for a few months, scrubby but gud enough compared to random pubbie kthxbai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bakta_tank</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bakta_tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still see remove_arty_from_game as the most popular tag in the foreseeable future on the forums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still see remove_arty_from_game as the most popular tag in the foreseeable future on the forums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberMaroon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CyberMaroon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the idea, yes. Even through the crew fixing would be a good thing (as it would then match the other crews), people hate changes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the idea, yes. Even through the crew fixing would be a good thing (as it would then match the other crews), people hate changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Boot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The_Boot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- spotting range minimap circle, render range minimap designator and spots where the enemy was seen last time on minimap will not be implemented.

why don&#039;t they just introduce them as perks and skills for the crew.
spotting range for the gunner, last seen for the radio operator, render range for the commander.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- spotting range minimap circle, render range minimap designator and spots where the enemy was seen last time on minimap will not be implemented.</p>
<p>why don&#8217;t they just introduce them as perks and skills for the crew.<br />
spotting range for the gunner, last seen for the radio operator, render range for the commander.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Boot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The_Boot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i wanna see a bot training room]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wanna see a bot training room</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except they arent.
Troll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except they arent.<br />
Troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Origami Chik3n</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Origami Chik3n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 05:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take it you have seen most if not all his videos? Even he himself says in his videos that he is whining and some of them are called &quot;The best of whining&quot;. Or maybe you just have an &quot;opinion&quot; without really knowing what it is that people are talking about?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it you have seen most if not all his videos? Even he himself says in his videos that he is whining and some of them are called &#8220;The best of whining&#8221;. Or maybe you just have an &#8220;opinion&#8221; without really knowing what it is that people are talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flak_panzer88</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/27/27-8-2014/#comment-187196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flak_panzer88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 04:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16162#comment-187196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eh? why? Chinese tanks are 100% copies of the soviet ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh? why? Chinese tanks are 100% copies of the soviet ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
