Comments on: 9.3 Patchnotes Errata http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Maskellator http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187740 Fri, 29 Aug 2014 07:36:10 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187740 I guess they wanted the first one to mean ‘Mark of Averageness…”

]]> By: CoolBreeze541 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187676 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 18:12:50 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187676 My Panther 2 is going to beast even harder now with no frontal transmission fires.

]]> By: Arnie1969 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187559 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:44:42 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187559 Reduce the Marks of Excellence values? Awesome, WG, make them worthless just because the potatoes complain they can’t get one.

]]> By: Madner Kami http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187534 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:15:42 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187534 Hopefully they don’t miss to fix it on the Löwe in this pass. Really looking for an excuse to not train Preventative on it -.-

]]> By: KV2 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187491 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:57:29 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187491 - “- Each of values for obtaining Marks of Excellence reduced by 7 points (58% instead of 65% for obtaining one Mark of Excellence, etc.).” – values required
yay, now getting a MoE on my t110e5 won’t be impossible. time to quit playing it till 9.3

]]> By: KawashimaKei http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187475 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:41:58 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187475 nahh,, that just some updated physic,, if full havoc was released (which i think it need atleast 3 month to implement all thosep physic) the patch must be around 3-5 Gb (including new building,, 80% of HD model,, and detailed interior in tanks)

]]> By: Zarkus http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187466 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:26:04 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187466 What? No “rebalancing” for Russian tanks? I’m so surprised! ;)

]]> By: SignalFire http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187457 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:13:54 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187457 Btw I read something about Havok coming in 9.3? Anyone know more details about this? Or are they just going to implement some extra physics that aren’t technically full havok?

]]> By: Legiondude http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187428 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:59:54 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187428 Won’t benefit yet, I suspect

They’ll probably work on the other tiers and eventually it’ll be a separate module for every tank, but to fit in the 9.3 crunch they could only fit the three top tiers

]]> By: Steiner011 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/28/9-3-patchnotes-errata/#comment-187406 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:45:58 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16228#comment-187406 - “which relays unique Special Instructions to clans.” – this should be “allows the clans to play special missions”

Thnx Silent

also, cant wait till you reply to someone , grey color much more pleasant 4 eyes, this white will cause snow blindness xD

]]>