<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 29.8.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anlushac11</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anlushac11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2014 18:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they are un linking engine and transmission yet the engine and transmission share a common hit point pool. 

So it seems a trans hit will no longer cause a fire but will damage engine and since they are now separate modules you will only be able to repair one of them  unless carrying large repair kit?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they are un linking engine and transmission yet the engine and transmission share a common hit point pool. </p>
<p>So it seems a trans hit will no longer cause a fire but will damage engine and since they are now separate modules you will only be able to repair one of them  unless carrying large repair kit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emanicas</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emanicas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2014 06:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His arrogance there is why I hate his comment. Tracks are an important part of the vehicle yet it doesn&#039;t count as blocking damage with your vehicle. What the fuck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His arrogance there is why I hate his comment. Tracks are an important part of the vehicle yet it doesn&#8217;t count as blocking damage with your vehicle. What the fuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hochstepanzerjager</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hochstepanzerjager]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Sturmtiger won’t be in the game, because it’s impossible to balance. &quot;

But the 183 is perfectly balanced, especially when turned into an autoloader...

I LOL&#039;d.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sturmtiger won’t be in the game, because it’s impossible to balance. &#8221;</p>
<p>But the 183 is perfectly balanced, especially when turned into an autoloader&#8230;</p>
<p>I LOL&#8217;d.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macmac</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macmac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Storm: “Blocking shells by tracks – that’s bullshit and not tanking” 
exactly ....  but its U INVENTET THAT GAMEPLAY. and its not blocking shels with tracks its bloscking shels with side armor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Storm: “Blocking shells by tracks – that’s bullshit and not tanking”<br />
exactly &#8230;.  but its U INVENTET THAT GAMEPLAY. and its not blocking shels with tracks its bloscking shels with side armor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treborn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Treborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 12:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What buffs for old tanks?
I thought people got used to powercreep already :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What buffs for old tanks?<br />
I thought people got used to powercreep already :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quineloe</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quineloe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;you’d have to “drive off by accident” three times in a row, so that’s apparently the limit of suicide punishment.&quot;

so the first two suicides remain just a regular full repair no money death, the punishment already in place? Idiots. Just giving in to endless whining on the forum, again.

&quot;- +/-1 MM will not be implemented (Storm: “It would be boring shit”)&quot;
+/-1 MM would have more tanks in them than the tier 3-10 battles had when this game came out. Did storm consider that game to be boring, too?

&quot;- the biggest problem for creating HD models for now is that outsourced modellers suck (lag behind)&quot;

Oh this again, nice. So you don&#039;t hire people for your company and choose to outsource, saving costs on it? Then you complain that these people are not as enthusiastic about doing work for you? Idiot!

&quot;- 9.3 performance optimization will not concern only weak computers&quot;

Does this mean that even modern, high end computers with have a shitty framerate again? I am concerned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;you’d have to “drive off by accident” three times in a row, so that’s apparently the limit of suicide punishment.&#8221;</p>
<p>so the first two suicides remain just a regular full repair no money death, the punishment already in place? Idiots. Just giving in to endless whining on the forum, again.</p>
<p>&#8220;- +/-1 MM will not be implemented (Storm: “It would be boring shit”)&#8221;<br />
+/-1 MM would have more tanks in them than the tier 3-10 battles had when this game came out. Did storm consider that game to be boring, too?</p>
<p>&#8220;- the biggest problem for creating HD models for now is that outsourced modellers suck (lag behind)&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh this again, nice. So you don&#8217;t hire people for your company and choose to outsource, saving costs on it? Then you complain that these people are not as enthusiastic about doing work for you? Idiot!</p>
<p>&#8220;- 9.3 performance optimization will not concern only weak computers&#8221;</p>
<p>Does this mean that even modern, high end computers with have a shitty framerate again? I am concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koo294</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koo294]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, exactly my point. It doesn&#039;t mean that shots that hit the tracks then bounce off the hull won&#039;t be rewarded though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, exactly my point. It doesn&#8217;t mean that shots that hit the tracks then bounce off the hull won&#8217;t be rewarded though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milan Štěpánek</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milan Štěpánek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sidescraping still gets your hull hit if you are playing germans/high tanks and I think it will work through tracks as well since tracks do not &quot;tank&quot; they just reduce pen and the shell proceeds to bounce on hull behind them.

Hulldown.. not exactly hard to do if you have a tank for it, they probably dont want to pu tanks with crap depression and turret armor at disadvantage but apparently dont care about tanks with crap hull armor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sidescraping still gets your hull hit if you are playing germans/high tanks and I think it will work through tracks as well since tracks do not &#8220;tank&#8221; they just reduce pen and the shell proceeds to bounce on hull behind them.</p>
<p>Hulldown.. not exactly hard to do if you have a tank for it, they probably dont want to pu tanks with crap depression and turret armor at disadvantage but apparently dont care about tanks with crap hull armor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 113</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[113]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[churchill gc does fine in T8 matches]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>churchill gc does fine in T8 matches</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedShocktrooper</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/08/29/29-8-2014/#comment-188253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RedShocktrooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2014 10:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16289#comment-188253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reverse it.

Bringing your  680 hp Tier 5 heavy to bare on a Tier 3 tank is fun too, no? And not everything is heavies - a Tier 4 tank destroyer against a Tier 6 medium or heavy is not as lopsided as you think. And are you going to tell me that killing a &quot;big mean Tier 7 heavy&quot; from full health in a &quot;tiny Tier 5&quot; isn&#039;t satisfying?

Instances where you would always be top tier - or very close to top tier - mean that there is little to no variance beyond player skill. You would see the same tanks over and over again at the same tier, which would get bland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reverse it.</p>
<p>Bringing your  680 hp Tier 5 heavy to bare on a Tier 3 tank is fun too, no? And not everything is heavies &#8211; a Tier 4 tank destroyer against a Tier 6 medium or heavy is not as lopsided as you think. And are you going to tell me that killing a &#8220;big mean Tier 7 heavy&#8221; from full health in a &#8220;tiny Tier 5&#8243; isn&#8217;t satisfying?</p>
<p>Instances where you would always be top tier &#8211; or very close to top tier &#8211; mean that there is little to no variance beyond player skill. You would see the same tanks over and over again at the same tier, which would get bland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
