Comments on: Buff my Conqueror!

By: Bugii

Bugii — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:30:41 +0000

tbh Im not sure about that.
I don have conqueror yet, 60k xp more and its mine.. but I’ve tried it on a test server…
I was like “OMG !!!” sure armor is rubbish, but that gun is awesome!
I wasnt impressed by its stats… medicore damage, and pen. for a heavy.
But man the shell velocity, aiming and precision… that gun “feels” awesome.

I wouldnt trade armor for the gun handling.. there is plenty of well armored heavy tanks … why changing conqueror to just another one them?

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:14:00 +0000

M103 is troll turret.
Can get penetrated by 209 pen…
Can bounce 303.

Its superior to the Conquerors turret though :)

By: Alexander Yordanov

Alexander Yordanov — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 07:09:45 +0000

M103 turret is better.
Mobility is a tie. Maybe Conq is better.
Firepower is for the conqueror.
Hul armor is a tie. Conq can angle and bait easier. M103 is a bitch at long distances.

By: Shapeshifter

Shapeshifter — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 04:46:45 +0000

Hell Chief had them scan a document that shows the M6A2E1 turret had 9 inches frontal armor and they won’t use that as it does not “Show exactly where the armor is located on the front”

Wonder how detailed the armor layout is for this turret armor? or does it only just say “13.5 inches frontal”

Double standard if they go ahead and use that then.

By: Gav

Gav — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:41:22 +0000

Horribads always blame others. After all, EVERY tank should cater to your play style and you should never have to adjust, right?

Quite frankly, you’re an idiot if you don’t hide your lower frontal plate, and if people are penetrating the turret, you’re exposing yourself like a retard.

Just one favor… keep up the shitty play so that WG won’t nerf this monster.

By: Gav

Gav — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:35:18 +0000

A lot of people confuse the Conqueror for an actual heavy tank.
It was designed to be a heavy support tank, and it plays like one. Not as far out as TDs, but far enough to quickly duck behind cover.
That’s exactly what the excellent aim time should be used for: minimizing exposure.

By: Gav

Gav — Tue, 02 Sep 2014 01:32:22 +0000

When’s the last time the elite turret had worse gun handling than the stock one?

Although, I guess they can do it Sherman Jumbo style and have the new turret be stock and have worse gun handling…. I’d like that.

By: YOBA

YOBA — Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:42:54 +0000

No pics, no drawings, unfortunately.

By: Drakko

Drakko — Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:38:58 +0000

Sorry mate, can’t find M103 better in any regard. Oh maybe the mobility and an extra degree of gun depression but compared to the Conqueror, the M103 has a shittier turret, is more prone to multiple module failure and it’s gun handling, while decent, is so far under the Conqueror, it doesn’t even bear mentioning. Not to mention that Conqueror fires faster and it’s got an extra ace up it’s sleeve, the HESH ammo instead of HE(105 pen) which really hurts.

Nothing brings a more sinister grin on my mug than snapshooting a wt form 400m away for over 500 dmg and multiple module damage

By: Drakko

Drakko — Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:26:35 +0000

Aaand do what when you get the M103? Cry again cuz it’s turret is even shittier?

Amen, want turret armor(actually armor of all kinds) and gun depression? ST-1 and E75