<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2.9.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GibMeister</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-190824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GibMeister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-190824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, lots of Rusky tanks have 0.5 accuracy or there abouts, I used to have Su152, the derp was about that, sure the aim circle was big but the shot always went to the centre of the aiming circle, that thing was really about 0.1 accuracy and you watch and see how bad the KV85 will be in reality......
Don&#039;t believe a word these guys say, I won&#039;t say any more....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, lots of Rusky tanks have 0.5 accuracy or there abouts, I used to have Su152, the derp was about that, sure the aim circle was big but the shot always went to the centre of the aiming circle, that thing was really about 0.1 accuracy and you watch and see how bad the KV85 will be in reality&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Don&#8217;t believe a word these guys say, I won&#8217;t say any more&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Badger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-190416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Badger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-190416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why what Could it possibly contain?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why what Could it possibly contain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Badger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-190414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Badger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-190414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Japanese heavies will come sooner than TD’s

What Japanese Heavy tanks?  What Japanese TD&#039;s?  sure there were few but very few.

Honestly why this game needs more designs never implemented but drawn on toilet paper is beyond me.  We have too many tanks that NEVER EXISTED in this game now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japanese heavies will come sooner than TD’s</p>
<p>What Japanese Heavy tanks?  What Japanese TD&#8217;s?  sure there were few but very few.</p>
<p>Honestly why this game needs more designs never implemented but drawn on toilet paper is beyond me.  We have too many tanks that NEVER EXISTED in this game now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YourNIGHTMare</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-190409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YourNIGHTMare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-190409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same story as with Chaffee and a StuG for example. They&#039;re both T5, yet very different battletiers.
It&#039;s not as easy as to &quot;just do limit it&quot;. There need to be thoughts and exceptions and first things first, an actual meaning of the &quot;Troll platoon&quot;. Is it the tier difference? The battle tier difference? Do both tanks have to have the sam or +-1 or +-2 MM?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same story as with Chaffee and a StuG for example. They&#8217;re both T5, yet very different battletiers.<br />
It&#8217;s not as easy as to &#8220;just do limit it&#8221;. There need to be thoughts and exceptions and first things first, an actual meaning of the &#8220;Troll platoon&#8221;. Is it the tier difference? The battle tier difference? Do both tanks have to have the sam or +-1 or +-2 MM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Badger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-190401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Badger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-190401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[developers do not consider KV-1S to be overpowered, the KV-1S/KV-85 split is not a nerf, but a “rebalancing”

Horse- hockey...

I&#039;ve Played over 1K of games in that tank and have my barrel star (s)
This is their proposed change: 

Gun: 122mm D2-5T
PEN: 175/217/61
DAM: 390/390/465
Reload time: 20s  When it&#039;s reload is about 13.1-13.8 seconds now (with rammer)
Aim time: 3,6s    When it&#039;s Aim-time is 3.4s (without a gun aimer about 2.8 with vents and aimer and gunner with 4 perks)
Accuracy: 0,5 When it&#039;s dispersion in .46
Depression: -3/+20

Not a rebalancing that&#039;s what we would call A NERF! plain a simple huge change on accuracy dispersion at 100m.   Charges to reload and aimtime that will cripple that tank.   A Change in depression too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>developers do not consider KV-1S to be overpowered, the KV-1S/KV-85 split is not a nerf, but a “rebalancing”</p>
<p>Horse- hockey&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve Played over 1K of games in that tank and have my barrel star (s)<br />
This is their proposed change: </p>
<p>Gun: 122mm D2-5T<br />
PEN: 175/217/61<br />
DAM: 390/390/465<br />
Reload time: 20s  When it&#8217;s reload is about 13.1-13.8 seconds now (with rammer)<br />
Aim time: 3,6s    When it&#8217;s Aim-time is 3.4s (without a gun aimer about 2.8 with vents and aimer and gunner with 4 perks)<br />
Accuracy: 0,5 When it&#8217;s dispersion in .46<br />
Depression: -3/+20</p>
<p>Not a rebalancing that&#8217;s what we would call A NERF! plain a simple huge change on accuracy dispersion at 100m.   Charges to reload and aimtime that will cripple that tank.   A Change in depression too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Pesto</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-189872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private Pesto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 11:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-189872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol, kv85 dpm with the 100mm is ridiculous]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, kv85 dpm with the 100mm is ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrimsonSam</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-189862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CrimsonSam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-189862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I drove it, the only thread in tier 6 was the 1s.
Now with the death of the kv1s, T150 will rule the games. That armor.
But more vulnerable in high tier.
But pls WG, don&#039;t touch it. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I drove it, the only thread in tier 6 was the 1s.<br />
Now with the death of the kv1s, T150 will rule the games. That armor.<br />
But more vulnerable in high tier.<br />
But pls WG, don&#8217;t touch it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brynky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-189858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brynky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-189858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that WG expects people to use armor skillfully and scoff from their high horse at tanking with tracks, while on the other hand they almost disable tanking by giving people prem shells that reduce the window of opportunity for tanking to a bare minimum. 
If I manage to get dmg eaten by my tracks, that&#039;s my skill for getting idiots to shoot it. Balance the amount of xp gained, don&#039;t deny the skill involved, cause it&#039;s simply insulting to the players that you deny them the use of a mechanic you as a developer introduced in the first place...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that WG expects people to use armor skillfully and scoff from their high horse at tanking with tracks, while on the other hand they almost disable tanking by giving people prem shells that reduce the window of opportunity for tanking to a bare minimum.<br />
If I manage to get dmg eaten by my tracks, that&#8217;s my skill for getting idiots to shoot it. Balance the amount of xp gained, don&#8217;t deny the skill involved, cause it&#8217;s simply insulting to the players that you deny them the use of a mechanic you as a developer introduced in the first place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brynky</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-189856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brynky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 10:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-189856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, there is a point in getting rid of the Awfulpanther from the light tank tree, because it&#039;s NOT A LIGHT TANK!! How could they even have the balls to put a panther chassis under a light turret and give it light tank bonus on movement????

If they put it as a sideshow attraction in the medium tree, fine, have a blast, but putting it in the lights is like taking a barn, writing &quot;Yacht&quot; on it, and giving it a watery sendoff... Equally productive. 
The fact the abomination sees t10 matches is even more hilarious. It can put out SOME dmg when flanking, sure, but it&#039;s camo is shit, and the &#039;armor&#039; it has is crap even in t7, let alone t9-10, so it gets one-shot by any high tier td, and two-shot by the rest of the field. 
Whats the point of a scout that&#039;s top tier for its country, and is seen by any other tank of its tier when on same footing?? If you&#039;re looking for proof of Wargaming being absolute DICKS about their EU audience, look no further than the nerf of VK2801 and the Awfulpanther being put there as a sick, perverted joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there is a point in getting rid of the Awfulpanther from the light tank tree, because it&#8217;s NOT A LIGHT TANK!! How could they even have the balls to put a panther chassis under a light turret and give it light tank bonus on movement????</p>
<p>If they put it as a sideshow attraction in the medium tree, fine, have a blast, but putting it in the lights is like taking a barn, writing &#8220;Yacht&#8221; on it, and giving it a watery sendoff&#8230; Equally productive.<br />
The fact the abomination sees t10 matches is even more hilarious. It can put out SOME dmg when flanking, sure, but it&#8217;s camo is shit, and the &#8216;armor&#8217; it has is crap even in t7, let alone t9-10, so it gets one-shot by any high tier td, and two-shot by the rest of the field.<br />
Whats the point of a scout that&#8217;s top tier for its country, and is seen by any other tank of its tier when on same footing?? If you&#8217;re looking for proof of Wargaming being absolute DICKS about their EU audience, look no further than the nerf of VK2801 and the Awfulpanther being put there as a sick, perverted joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eky Kwan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/2-9-2014/#comment-189786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eky Kwan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16470#comment-189786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let T92 LT be a tier7 premium, its spec is generally worse than Walker Bulldog.  (just want more high tier premium LT)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let T92 LT be a tier7 premium, its spec is generally worse than Walker Bulldog.  (just want more high tier premium LT)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
