<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.3 Tank Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mare_dre</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-190532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mare_dre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-190532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has low range, thats true. But thats the only weakness it has. It&#039;s faster than scouts, small and hard to hit, shoots and aims fast, can perma track tanks. You&#039;re right, its not retarded, its OP. And kv2 shooting over the whole map and killing a tank, scouts bouncing e100 heat shots, is not rng? In the end, every single one of us can complain about whatever he wants, it&#039;s all up to WG what happens in the end]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has low range, thats true. But thats the only weakness it has. It&#8217;s faster than scouts, small and hard to hit, shoots and aims fast, can perma track tanks. You&#8217;re right, its not retarded, its OP. And kv2 shooting over the whole map and killing a tank, scouts bouncing e100 heat shots, is not rng? In the end, every single one of us can complain about whatever he wants, it&#8217;s all up to WG what happens in the end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mare_dre</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-190531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mare_dre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 06:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-190531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s arty haters who are doing the complaining. Did u skip the part where i said i hate the FV304? My point was if players whine for being hit by arty that IS NOT accurate (even though u will probably say otherwise) and aims for more that 7 seconds, it&#039;s their fault only. And its not less skilled part of the game if u want do be really good at it. Plus, if tankers wouldn&#039;t attack on the same 3 lines out of the 10 on the whole map every fucking time, they would be safer

With the rising number of scouts sleeping or suiciding, heavies and TDs camping and being mostly useless, playing arty is not that easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s arty haters who are doing the complaining. Did u skip the part where i said i hate the FV304? My point was if players whine for being hit by arty that IS NOT accurate (even though u will probably say otherwise) and aims for more that 7 seconds, it&#8217;s their fault only. And its not less skilled part of the game if u want do be really good at it. Plus, if tankers wouldn&#8217;t attack on the same 3 lines out of the 10 on the whole map every fucking time, they would be safer</p>
<p>With the rising number of scouts sleeping or suiciding, heavies and TDs camping and being mostly useless, playing arty is not that easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Damian</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-190266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emmanuel Damian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-190266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could at least wait for the exact stats to be released before making such statements. We already know that EVERYTHING about the Chaffee is being lowered to Tier V standard, including its XP requirement getting lowered to around 12k instead of the current 55k (already saved up that much on the M5 so I can unlock it come 9.3). It&#039;s likely the repair costs will be lowered as well to match.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could at least wait for the exact stats to be released before making such statements. We already know that EVERYTHING about the Chaffee is being lowered to Tier V standard, including its XP requirement getting lowered to around 12k instead of the current 55k (already saved up that much on the M5 so I can unlock it come 9.3). It&#8217;s likely the repair costs will be lowered as well to match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temujingamer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[temujingamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 09:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[check dat nice premium tankz:

http://world-of-tanks.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/heavy.png]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check dat nice premium tankz:</p>
<p><a href="http://world-of-tanks.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/heavy.png" rel="nofollow">http://world-of-tanks.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/heavy.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiberiu Micu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiberiu Micu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the buff for IS???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the buff for IS???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComradeHX</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComradeHX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They have the FV304 because it&#039;s not as retarded as other ones, because it has low range so it has to be closer to front.

Other ones can allow rng to hit a fullspeed scout that is turning without aiming from across the map.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have the FV304 because it&#8217;s not as retarded as other ones, because it has low range so it has to be closer to front.</p>
<p>Other ones can allow rng to hit a fullspeed scout that is turning without aiming from across the map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: temujingamer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[temujingamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 05:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i bet we are going to sit on the M6A2E1 buff for few years. I mean, not like we were waiting for it for ? 2 ? 3 years ? don&#039;t remember, i paid 80€ to feel it deep in my ass so long time ago...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bet we are going to sit on the M6A2E1 buff for few years. I mean, not like we were waiting for it for ? 2 ? 3 years ? don&#8217;t remember, i paid 80€ to feel it deep in my ass so long time ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenrir2205</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fenrir2205]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They already are quite diferent,  the only thing they have in common is the 4 round autoloader with 1600 average burst dmg. The 50 B can out run pretty much any tank exept for few mediums with its top speed of 60-65km/h. While the T57 only has 35 and is going to have to need some kind of backup. The only thing the T57 realy has better than the 50 B is that the full reload is about 6 seconds faster, the time between shots is 0,5 seconds faster, and it has 32 more armor on the hull.
At the moment the foch can go faster, aims faster, turns faster, has more ammo, only 6 second diference on full reload compared to T57 and over all has more survivability if used propper. 
The nerf of the T57 is kinda stupid the way they make it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already are quite diferent,  the only thing they have in common is the 4 round autoloader with 1600 average burst dmg. The 50 B can out run pretty much any tank exept for few mediums with its top speed of 60-65km/h. While the T57 only has 35 and is going to have to need some kind of backup. The only thing the T57 realy has better than the 50 B is that the full reload is about 6 seconds faster, the time between shots is 0,5 seconds faster, and it has 32 more armor on the hull.<br />
At the moment the foch can go faster, aims faster, turns faster, has more ammo, only 6 second diference on full reload compared to T57 and over all has more survivability if used propper.<br />
The nerf of the T57 is kinda stupid the way they make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiger61378</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tiger61378]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm...minor nerfs to Bert (and much needed, even coming from a Bert owner who gave it gold paint &amp; emblems), T18 &quot;nerfed&quot; (yeah, ok, not much there), and the 100mm on the IS buffed.  I might just have to stick the 100mm on my IS just to see how much extra DPM I can get out of it over the 122...fast heavy with a relatively fast firing gun and somewhat troll armor for its tier?  Yes please!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;minor nerfs to Bert (and much needed, even coming from a Bert owner who gave it gold paint &amp; emblems), T18 &#8220;nerfed&#8221; (yeah, ok, not much there), and the 100mm on the IS buffed.  I might just have to stick the 100mm on my IS just to see how much extra DPM I can get out of it over the 122&#8230;fast heavy with a relatively fast firing gun and somewhat troll armor for its tier?  Yes please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BloodiDodi</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/02/9-3-tank-changes/#comment-189761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BloodiDodi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 02:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16467#comment-189761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T57 Needs to have SOMETHING better than 50B (other than that pretty much laughable for tier 10 armor) to have any place in the game. AMX 50B already has better long range fire capabilities and much better mobility on top of that.
I don&#039;t understand all that crying about T57 when it&#039;s close enough to AMX 50B while there is something like WT E100 in the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T57 Needs to have SOMETHING better than 50B (other than that pretty much laughable for tier 10 armor) to have any place in the game. AMX 50B already has better long range fire capabilities and much better mobility on top of that.<br />
I don&#8217;t understand all that crying about T57 when it&#8217;s close enough to AMX 50B while there is something like WT E100 in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
