Comments on: 6.9.2014

By: BloodiDodi

BloodiDodi — Mon, 08 Sep 2014 20:41:24 +0000

That Premium US TD doen’t look that much interesting

By: the_cowardly_dog

the_cowardly_dog — Sun, 07 Sep 2014 17:29:57 +0000

All give a warm welcome in chat to new FPS drops in 9,3!!!
This happens so often that it should be added in the patch notes.
Wonder if they nerfed the FPS loss or buffed it this time!?!

By: gargamel9000

gargamel9000 — Sun, 07 Sep 2014 12:24:38 +0000

Beautiful, isn’t it? :D

By: Starblade7

Starblade7 — Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:59:38 +0000

Given the extreme popularity of certain tanks in that line, is it really surprising that WG would like players to spend more time reaching the higher-tier tanks? For every extra step to Tier X, they make money from players buying premium time, gold ammo, and converting free exp. Profit keeps them in business, and usually means that they can continue to produce new content. I’m also happy to have noobs and/or newbs spend more time at lower tiers rather than rushing up to the IS, IS-3 and being unable to be a contributing team member.

By: gargamel9000

gargamel9000 — Sun, 07 Sep 2014 08:49:15 +0000

> “the way the Soviet heavy line looks in 9.3 is apparently final (SS: not sure why anyone asked about that, did I miss anything?)”

Well, there are now 11 tanks in the IS branch. It’s the longest branch in the game now, because you have to pass 5 tier tank twice: KV1 and KV1s.
The same if you choose from med line, two 7 tier tanks: KV-13 and IS.

WG seriously “nerfed” that line of tanks.

By: buzzkill150

buzzkill150 — Sun, 07 Sep 2014 00:56:31 +0000

Indeed..thats what being a closed off communist society gets you. They are 10yrs behind the times.

By: buzzkill150

buzzkill150 — Sun, 07 Sep 2014 00:55:44 +0000

Arty is cancer

By: SACEUR

SACEUR — Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:50:08 +0000

yeah but 4 or 5 ammo racks per GAME? Dude its excessive

By: SaintCaboose

SaintCaboose — Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:59:12 +0000

they just swapped the models, stats are the same (it still has the 76mm M1A1)

By: Hotwired

Hotwired — Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:31:52 +0000

I’m hoping this isn’t going to be it for changes to M6A2E1.

Its thick unsloped (pretty much) frontal armour has been obsolete for a long time now against anyone who knows how to press #2 while in most mediums, heavies and tds it comes across.

The armour on the other three sides hasn’t ever been an issue for light tanks or larger non-arty HE shells.

Gun is an inferior (RoF) version of the same thing on the T29 a tier below.

28kph top speed, weak traverse and huge penalties for showing the very large and thin sides of hull or turret round off the package of a flankers second best wet dream after the one about molesting artillery.