<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9.9.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoTHavoc</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-194033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoTHavoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-194033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;no tank in the game is balanced with players using only gold ammo on Wargaming’s mind&quot;

Yeah, because we try to make a balanced game but... hell, who cares! Gold ammo is expensive nobody uses too much of it!
It was really expectable - even a blind man would see that penetration of gold rounds has nothing to do with regular penetration and is sometimes completly imbalanced. Correcting it would take est. several hours, or even less, just give it a fixed penetration buff eg. +25% for APCR and +40% for HEAT - IF tanks are balanced well with regular ammo, so they will be with premium ammo.

But no, why? Leave 330 pen Ob. 416 and T-54 as it is, since nobody plays them in such configuration, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;no tank in the game is balanced with players using only gold ammo on Wargaming’s mind&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, because we try to make a balanced game but&#8230; hell, who cares! Gold ammo is expensive nobody uses too much of it!<br />
It was really expectable &#8211; even a blind man would see that penetration of gold rounds has nothing to do with regular penetration and is sometimes completly imbalanced. Correcting it would take est. several hours, or even less, just give it a fixed penetration buff eg. +25% for APCR and +40% for HEAT &#8211; IF tanks are balanced well with regular ammo, so they will be with premium ammo.</p>
<p>But no, why? Leave 330 pen Ob. 416 and T-54 as it is, since nobody plays them in such configuration, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 21:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Type 59 with Light Tank camo bonus. That is all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Type 59 with Light Tank camo bonus. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think i&#039;m one of those guys who hates whiners as much as SerB does, and with good reasons

RIP old arty accuracy.

now the fucking noobs dont know how to take fucking cover]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think i&#8217;m one of those guys who hates whiners as much as SerB does, and with good reasons</p>
<p>RIP old arty accuracy.</p>
<p>now the fucking noobs dont know how to take fucking cover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugii</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bugii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Estimated Time of Arrival
Level of Details]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estimated Time of Arrival<br />
Level of Details</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minh Hoa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minh Hoa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uhm.....
what is ETA and LOD?
Are they abbreviations?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm&#8230;..<br />
what is ETA and LOD?<br />
Are they abbreviations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramp4ge</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramp4ge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Whatever it had on it will stay on it&quot;

Except the modules that made it worth spending 75k exp...

Just sayin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whatever it had on it will stay on it&#8221;</p>
<p>Except the modules that made it worth spending 75k exp&#8230;</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can still find a prototype to the prototype and put it in tier7!

And add the obscure demolition T-54 with the 122mm howitzer, brought to you by the same WG dev that made the E50M xD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can still find a prototype to the prototype and put it in tier7!</p>
<p>And add the obscure demolition T-54 with the 122mm howitzer, brought to you by the same WG dev that made the E50M xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Pesto</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Private Pesto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of balance, WG acknoledges that gold imbalances vehicles, but they balance tanks ariund theyre standard ammo, and refuse to rebalance the worst cases of this. T54 for example, worse ap pen than the patton, but better gold pen with that ridiculously op heat. Wg logic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of balance, WG acknoledges that gold imbalances vehicles, but they balance tanks ariund theyre standard ammo, and refuse to rebalance the worst cases of this. T54 for example, worse ap pen than the patton, but better gold pen with that ridiculously op heat. Wg logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuri_Yslin</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuri_Yslin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why the assumption that everybody uses the stupid 152mm derp? 90mm is way better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why the assumption that everybody uses the stupid 152mm derp? 90mm is way better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DemolitionDmitrij</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/9-9-2014/#comment-193190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DemolitionDmitrij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16919#comment-193190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I will drive my Panther now &quot;water down&quot; instead of &quot;hull down&quot;? -.-]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I will drive my Panther now &#8220;water down&#8221; instead of &#8220;hull down&#8221;? -.-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
