<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU Server Statistics &#8211; Last Two Weeks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schepel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schepel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Leo and the STB1 are, generally, played by better players. I would not be overly surprised if the overall WR of these tanks has gone down a little. Also, nimble mediums are much better to adapt to the maps. However, they are more versatile than tank destroyers. They can relocate and flank, even if it does require a heavy to make a path for them in some situations. Most tank destroyers lack the speed to react effectively to the way the battle progrresses. 

By the way, the FV4202 is really good since the buff. I would say this tank is generally underestimated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Leo and the STB1 are, generally, played by better players. I would not be overly surprised if the overall WR of these tanks has gone down a little. Also, nimble mediums are much better to adapt to the maps. However, they are more versatile than tank destroyers. They can relocate and flank, even if it does require a heavy to make a path for them in some situations. Most tank destroyers lack the speed to react effectively to the way the battle progrresses. </p>
<p>By the way, the FV4202 is really good since the buff. I would say this tank is generally underestimated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Yordanov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Yordanov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Win Ratio is the SINGLE most important stat.
It IS MUCH more important then any other stat.

Average XP takes into account premium accounts. Or at least used to. It is mostly useless unless its 900+ (for T8 and up).
Average Damage aint bad and can HELP with analyzing tank performance... but that is just average damage. You have to take other stuff into account.
Damage tanked is important. But it is almost like the avg. damage.
So is spotting. So is avg. kill per battle...

Win ratio takes ALL into account and more, like team work, being able to take shots for your team and so on.
It should not be the ONLY way you look at a tank. But it is THE most important one.

Medjed, you disappoint me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Win Ratio is the SINGLE most important stat.<br />
It IS MUCH more important then any other stat.</p>
<p>Average XP takes into account premium accounts. Or at least used to. It is mostly useless unless its 900+ (for T8 and up).<br />
Average Damage aint bad and can HELP with analyzing tank performance&#8230; but that is just average damage. You have to take other stuff into account.<br />
Damage tanked is important. But it is almost like the avg. damage.<br />
So is spotting. So is avg. kill per battle&#8230;</p>
<p>Win ratio takes ALL into account and more, like team work, being able to take shots for your team and so on.<br />
It should not be the ONLY way you look at a tank. But it is THE most important one.</p>
<p>Medjed, you disappoint me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 04:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hitler coment made me LOL

Actually you hit the nail on the head.....Whereaboos do exactly this, &quot;Sure we lost the overall war but...
We were outnumbered 10 to 1&quot;
We had best tech and with 2 more years would have won&quot;
We had Tigers bro...TIGERS, thats right end of story.

i just noticed they are the biggest Shoulda Coulda Woulda people anywhere.

Funny how many times the Germans got lucky on the way to there Epic Victories. If US would have came in war in 38 Patton would have been in Dday in 41 and it would have been GG. Or a million other alt realities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler coment made me LOL</p>
<p>Actually you hit the nail on the head&#8230;..Whereaboos do exactly this, &#8220;Sure we lost the overall war but&#8230;<br />
We were outnumbered 10 to 1&#8243;<br />
We had best tech and with 2 more years would have won&#8221;<br />
We had Tigers bro&#8230;TIGERS, thats right end of story.</p>
<p>i just noticed they are the biggest Shoulda Coulda Woulda people anywhere.</p>
<p>Funny how many times the Germans got lucky on the way to there Epic Victories. If US would have came in war in 38 Patton would have been in Dday in 41 and it would have been GG. Or a million other alt realities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 04:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was the best at one point....For like a month :)

In reality instead of replacing it I wish they would simply add another T10 and maybe make the 215b either the alt T10 or a TD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the best at one point&#8230;.For like a month :)</p>
<p>In reality instead of replacing it I wish they would simply add another T10 and maybe make the 215b either the alt T10 or a TD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 04:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[183 in a Purps hands was most def a winner with much higher W/R than say a IS4.

Also both you mention are support tanks. Look at the really OP tanks like the KV1s and or the T54 med and they win with both newbs and Purps alike. 

Remembe this isnt like stats for players where you are trying to look at if platooning was a factor etc, if a tank is OP in a platoon people will use it that way where as if a player platoons his W/R is tainted.

W/R over the entire playerbase is a good way to show how OP a tank is assuming that it is evenly sampled....So the reason the STB1 and 263 are so high is because newbs dont play them as much similiar to the m60 and VK. 

So for W/R to be correct it needs tons of numbers and a broad range of people.

Look how the M48 which we all know is inferior to the 140 in almost everysingle way is very similar in W/R. Its because players who keep it either love it and make it work or are RL fanbois and make it work but wther way a typical newb who needs the best tank ingame just to break 49% would never us the m48.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>183 in a Purps hands was most def a winner with much higher W/R than say a IS4.</p>
<p>Also both you mention are support tanks. Look at the really OP tanks like the KV1s and or the T54 med and they win with both newbs and Purps alike. </p>
<p>Remembe this isnt like stats for players where you are trying to look at if platooning was a factor etc, if a tank is OP in a platoon people will use it that way where as if a player platoons his W/R is tainted.</p>
<p>W/R over the entire playerbase is a good way to show how OP a tank is assuming that it is evenly sampled&#8230;.So the reason the STB1 and 263 are so high is because newbs dont play them as much similiar to the m60 and VK. </p>
<p>So for W/R to be correct it needs tons of numbers and a broad range of people.</p>
<p>Look how the M48 which we all know is inferior to the 140 in almost everysingle way is very similar in W/R. Its because players who keep it either love it and make it work or are RL fanbois and make it work but wther way a typical newb who needs the best tank ingame just to break 49% would never us the m48.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 04:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you post one in english?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you post one in english?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hen Ry</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hen Ry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations. You just watched the pre-nerfed FV played with gold only. 
Gold is always unfair, and especially on the FV, unpredictable. A great battle completly depends on luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations. You just watched the pre-nerfed FV played with gold only.<br />
Gold is always unfair, and especially on the FV, unpredictable. A great battle completly depends on luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vamproy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193161</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vamproy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ain&#039;t *

isn&#039;t..  or just plain and simple.. is not*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ain&#8217;t *</p>
<p>isn&#8217;t..  or just plain and simple.. is not*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hen Ry</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hen Ry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened? You don&#039;t understand the meaning of imba.
Arties are also imba - imbalanced. They can kill you with one hit, they will annoy their enemies, they have their moments, but most of the time, they suck really bad. 
The FV &#039;could&#039; deal 2k damage, but most likely it&#039;s only 500 and the FV dies while reloading.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened? You don&#8217;t understand the meaning of imba.<br />
Arties are also imba &#8211; imbalanced. They can kill you with one hit, they will annoy their enemies, they have their moments, but most of the time, they suck really bad.<br />
The FV &#8216;could&#8217; deal 2k damage, but most likely it&#8217;s only 500 and the FV dies while reloading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hen Ry</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/09/eu-server-statistics-last-two-weeks/#comment-193158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hen Ry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 22:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=16913#comment-193158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mantlet still has 250 mm of armor along with the rest of the front (excluding LFP). It&#039;s better angled, but still can&#039;t be reliably pentrated without gold.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mantlet still has 250 mm of armor along with the rest of the front (excluding LFP). It&#8217;s better angled, but still can&#8217;t be reliably pentrated without gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
