Comments on: New “Ambience” – Explosions

By: RagnarokBazil

RagnarokBazil — Thu, 11 Sep 2014 04:33:43 +0000

for sea driving tanks amfibious tanks get 30 secs instead of 10 :D

By: RagnarokBazil

RagnarokBazil — Thu, 11 Sep 2014 04:31:33 +0000

think of the arty shells this way. Its useless yes but its funny watching people think there getting shot at when there not lol i guess thats rng for ya. take advantage of the confusion and it will allow you to last longer. or make battles alot more easier to enjoy.

By: Vixatious

Vixatious — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:21:52 +0000

That’s still retarded.

By: realbattousai

realbattousai — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 19:52:40 +0000

My PC is fine, I just have a beef with anyone who sits there in their ivory tower and tells people to just ‘get a new PC’, unless they are offering to buy it, they need to shut up.

By: ClassicFrog (EU)

ClassicFrog (EU) — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:45:25 +0000

If by a chance they would manage to pull it off without FPS loss, then why not? It might have similar function as weather effects, with the dust from explosions affecting spotting.

Besides it’s not like war is fought in a sterile room, with only certain combatants present and nothing else. This game can use some immersion and some war actually going on around.

By: LonerPrime

LonerPrime — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:27:12 +0000

Sigh… why do you advocates of “Buy new PC” movement always forget that this damn game is unoptimized? Sure I get your point that crying over old hardware is counter productive for game development but it still doesn’t change the fact that this game is moody. For example my core2duo e8400 teamed with HD 5850 can play this game just fine at 1080p,60fps. Sure if I make fast movements from left to right the game’s performance dips but that’s natural and I don’t expect perfection from a rig that ancient. But when I read i5 and i7 users complaining about fluctuating fps in the forums it makes me cringe. You ask people to upgrade but no one can even guarantee that dumping money will actually improve experience for sure and even if it does will it be satisfying enough to be worth the money? I’ll definitely take your argument into consideration the day WG actually optimizes this game. Until then performance from this game is purely hit and miss and I would prefer reducing graphic settings and making the game playable rather than upgrade for the sake of playing just WOT.

By: Striker

Striker — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:55:54 +0000

No Michael Bay comments, yet?

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:27:14 +0000

@Daemonik “I want an enjoyable GAME world where I feel like I am on a battlefield driving a tank”.

more and more people seem to hate the idea of a real battle field and a real ambiance/atmosphere so they just bash to shit instead anything that tries to create this war atmosphere. i don’t even understand what the hell is so wrong with this video since it does seem to be quite awesome.

not to mention that it does teaches those complaining players how artillery was really actually firing in the war.

By: Soifon99

Soifon99 — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:16:05 +0000

it’s a free game, so… you really don’t have to play it you know…

and i have a semi normal pc.. never had any fps drops what so ever.

i5 2nd gen/gefore 760 / 8 gig ram / ssd. (almost 3/4 years old)

By: Soifon99

Soifon99 — Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:13:22 +0000

time moves on, development moves on, if your shitty 10 year old pc can’t handle it anymore.. too bad.. save money for better shit, steal it, or stop playing pc games and move to a xbox or ps system..

but stop crying about the fucking game! if you have a pc that was very good 3/4 year ago you can play this game fine.. so…..

why do people even play a game when you have to turn down the graphics to a level where it looks like your in lego land in 1993…