<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15.9.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KVASKAKTANK</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KVASKAKTANK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No i must be 1rd]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No i must be 1rd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolaj Winther</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikolaj Winther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all fairness, no it isn&#039;t funny - it&#039;s logical.

Of course, sometimes the &quot;historical&quot; aspects will mess with game balance and making one tank more &quot;historical&quot; will require rebalancing of all other tanks.

The whole idea with hitpoints is all balance.

Funny is when they ignore both historicity and balance - like with gold ammo or any number of consumables.

That any tank would drive around with a rack full of HEAT or other &quot;gold&quot; ammo is unhistorical and imbalanced.
That&#039;s the part they won&#039;t admit, because it&#039;s &quot;fiscal&quot; (i.e. built-in imbalance/unhistoricity = money for WG).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all fairness, no it isn&#8217;t funny &#8211; it&#8217;s logical.</p>
<p>Of course, sometimes the &#8220;historical&#8221; aspects will mess with game balance and making one tank more &#8220;historical&#8221; will require rebalancing of all other tanks.</p>
<p>The whole idea with hitpoints is all balance.</p>
<p>Funny is when they ignore both historicity and balance &#8211; like with gold ammo or any number of consumables.</p>
<p>That any tank would drive around with a rack full of HEAT or other &#8220;gold&#8221; ammo is unhistorical and imbalanced.<br />
That&#8217;s the part they won&#8217;t admit, because it&#8217;s &#8220;fiscal&#8221; (i.e. built-in imbalance/unhistoricity = money for WG).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dejan Lukić</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dejan Lukić]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are you surprised they have problems with balancing?! They released so many tanks, no one can balance everything. This isn&#039;t me trying to defend them but to rain hate on them because it&#039;s their own problem because they used &quot;give more tanks&quot; improvement tactics when they should&#039;ve used &quot;make better gameplay&quot; tactics! We are waiting for better engine for 3 years now. MM is still extreme BS and that&#039;s because of their sneaky win/lose system (don&#039;t believe me). We will never have in-game trade market. We will never have reasonable premium tanks. We will always suffer from &quot;nerf everything&quot; instead of &quot;buff&quot; everything strategies. And we will always have SerB saying &quot;whine some more&quot; when EU market says things that are actually a big problem and really not another whine comment...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you surprised they have problems with balancing?! They released so many tanks, no one can balance everything. This isn&#8217;t me trying to defend them but to rain hate on them because it&#8217;s their own problem because they used &#8220;give more tanks&#8221; improvement tactics when they should&#8217;ve used &#8220;make better gameplay&#8221; tactics! We are waiting for better engine for 3 years now. MM is still extreme BS and that&#8217;s because of their sneaky win/lose system (don&#8217;t believe me). We will never have in-game trade market. We will never have reasonable premium tanks. We will always suffer from &#8220;nerf everything&#8221; instead of &#8220;buff&#8221; everything strategies. And we will always have SerB saying &#8220;whine some more&#8221; when EU market says things that are actually a big problem and really not another whine comment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Origami Chik3n</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Origami Chik3n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The reason of this rate of fire is game balance&quot;.

Ain&#039;t it funny how WG juggles between &quot;historical accuracy&quot; and &quot;game ballance&quot; whichever is more convenient to them. Not that i think that being hypocrite is bad or anything. What&#039;s bad is that they have no balls to admit it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The reason of this rate of fire is game balance&#8221;.</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t it funny how WG juggles between &#8220;historical accuracy&#8221; and &#8220;game ballance&#8221; whichever is more convenient to them. Not that i think that being hypocrite is bad or anything. What&#8217;s bad is that they have no balls to admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T49 is a pointless, pointless tank.
Overrated and overhyped...

But overfun and ridiculously hilarious to play :&#039;D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T49 is a pointless, pointless tank.<br />
Overrated and overhyped&#8230;</p>
<p>But overfun and ridiculously hilarious to play :&#8217;D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolaj Winther</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikolaj Winther]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Perhaps they need to advertise that all accounts must be used and any acount with no activity over a certain time period will be cancelled.&quot;

Perhaps not cancelled - but just reset the name somehow, tell them to find a new name.
Alternatively, there should be a cancellation warning AND a very long waiting period, depending on the number of games played. I&#039;d be pretty pissed if I&#039;d built a huge garage and paid for any number of tanks - take a year off - and then find out I have to rebuild from scratch.

Fair enough to say &quot;if you have played &gt;100 games, reset period will be three months. If you have played &gt;1000 games, it&#039;s 6 months, &gt;10000 matches 12 months, &lt;10000 matches 24 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Perhaps they need to advertise that all accounts must be used and any acount with no activity over a certain time period will be cancelled.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps not cancelled &#8211; but just reset the name somehow, tell them to find a new name.<br />
Alternatively, there should be a cancellation warning AND a very long waiting period, depending on the number of games played. I&#8217;d be pretty pissed if I&#8217;d built a huge garage and paid for any number of tanks &#8211; take a year off &#8211; and then find out I have to rebuild from scratch.</p>
<p>Fair enough to say &#8220;if you have played &gt;100 games, reset period will be three months. If you have played &gt;1000 games, it&#8217;s 6 months, &gt;10000 matches 12 months, &lt;10000 matches 24 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W1zzar3</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[W1zzar3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- developers will try to implement increased view range for the entire light tank class

amg buff my ELC !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- developers will try to implement increased view range for the entire light tank class</p>
<p>amg buff my ELC !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratseal</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ratseal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 06:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it time for the SJWs to tweet selfies of themselves holding signs demanding convertible XP or social justice for Type 62 crews?

I mean, it worked so well for the schoolgirls kidnapped in W. Africa - except that they are still kidnapped and the topic has dropped from SJW radar. Convenient, that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it time for the SJWs to tweet selfies of themselves holding signs demanding convertible XP or social justice for Type 62 crews?</p>
<p>I mean, it worked so well for the schoolgirls kidnapped in W. Africa &#8211; except that they are still kidnapped and the topic has dropped from SJW radar. Convenient, that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evi7stylez .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evi7stylez .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- the crew role change is not difficult to implement technically, it will come
-------------------------
Then WHY are you not doing it!??
I could make an army of USSR and USA Radioman crews with 2 or 3 perks.. And I am now approaching many Tier10 tanks, which will have a need for additional loader, so a good retrained radioman would be just perfect rather then pulling out a total rookie with 0 skills and broken arm!

- it’s possible that in 9.4, the Type 62 crew setup will be changed to correspond the one of WZ-131
------------------------
Finally :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- the crew role change is not difficult to implement technically, it will come<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Then WHY are you not doing it!??<br />
I could make an army of USSR and USA Radioman crews with 2 or 3 perks.. And I am now approaching many Tier10 tanks, which will have a need for additional loader, so a good retrained radioman would be just perfect rather then pulling out a total rookie with 0 skills and broken arm!</p>
<p>- it’s possible that in 9.4, the Type 62 crew setup will be changed to correspond the one of WZ-131<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Finally :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir_Arthur McGuinness</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/15/15-9-2014/#comment-196073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sir_Arthur McGuinness]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17176#comment-196073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow you must be in college....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you must be in college&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
