<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tank Grote Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meneldil</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meneldil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FFS, multi turret mecanism was promised when the french tanks were previewed. When was that? 3 years ago?

I honestly think I&#039;ve never seen a company as amateurish as WG. The fact that they could pull out such a great game despite being so crappy developpers is unbelievable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FFS, multi turret mecanism was promised when the french tanks were previewed. When was that? 3 years ago?</p>
<p>I honestly think I&#8217;ve never seen a company as amateurish as WG. The fact that they could pull out such a great game despite being so crappy developpers is unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrimsonSam</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CrimsonSam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Te-Ke has a FAR better camo. I have a 90% camo skill on it and nobody sees me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Te-Ke has a FAR better camo. I have a 90% camo skill on it and nobody sees me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 23r0_NA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[23r0_NA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only problem is that it&#039;s a one-off tank that frankly just doesn&#039;t fit as a regular vehicle.  As a premium, it could work, but if the Soviets were to have a tier 4 heavy, the best option would be the T-35 (possibly as an optional side-grade from the T-28).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem is that it&#8217;s a one-off tank that frankly just doesn&#8217;t fit as a regular vehicle.  As a premium, it could work, but if the Soviets were to have a tier 4 heavy, the best option would be the T-35 (possibly as an optional side-grade from the T-28).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haplo013</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haplo013]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be nice to see this balanced as a Tier 4.  That way the USSR tree would have a Tier 4 heavy.  With the B1, B2 and DW2 as current Tier 4 heavy&#039;s it could fit in nicely i think.  Also we already have Churchill 3 and KV-220 as Premium tier 5 Russian heavy&#039;s.  Plus we have the KV-1 &amp; KV-1S at tier 5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see this balanced as a Tier 4.  That way the USSR tree would have a Tier 4 heavy.  With the B1, B2 and DW2 as current Tier 4 heavy&#8217;s it could fit in nicely i think.  Also we already have Churchill 3 and KV-220 as Premium tier 5 Russian heavy&#8217;s.  Plus we have the KV-1 &amp; KV-1S at tier 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3BAC</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3BAC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason I can see is that the Grote&#039;s useless turret is sitting on top of its main one.  Shouldn&#039;t really make a difference, so I&#039;m wondering if there isn&#039;t other issues at play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I can see is that the Grote&#8217;s useless turret is sitting on top of its main one.  Shouldn&#8217;t really make a difference, so I&#8217;m wondering if there isn&#8217;t other issues at play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3BAC</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3BAC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You do know its pen was buffed since they gave it out, right?  That made all the difference.  It&#039;s still fragile, but it&#039;s still fun when you want to go blow off steam.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know its pen was buffed since they gave it out, right?  That made all the difference.  It&#8217;s still fragile, but it&#8217;s still fun when you want to go blow off steam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3BAC</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3BAC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s absolutely no reason they couldn&#039;t treat it like the top turret of the M3 Lee.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s absolutely no reason they couldn&#8217;t treat it like the top turret of the M3 Lee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SzalonyChemik</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SzalonyChemik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So multiturret mechanic is scrapped completely? As far as I know it was &quot;only&quot; postponed into indefinite future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So multiturret mechanic is scrapped completely? As far as I know it was &#8220;only&#8221; postponed into indefinite future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tpaktop2_1</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tpaktop2_1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why can&#039;t WG AI the turret like they do with rear gunners in WoWP? The player has control over the main guns. Unless the AI process bombs out the game engine is the only reason for not doing so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t WG AI the turret like they do with rear gunners in WoWP? The player has control over the main guns. Unless the AI process bombs out the game engine is the only reason for not doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleipnir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/16/tank-grote-model/#comment-196274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sleipnir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17189#comment-196274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[down hill with back wind]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>down hill with back wind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
