Comments on: Yuri Pasholok Q&A http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: Conejo82 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198999 Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:04:17 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198999 Mouse proto? wth?

]]> By: LiquidInferno http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198973 Tue, 23 Sep 2014 02:19:24 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198973 It’s WG, their retardation knows no bounds.

]]> By: 23r0_NA http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198955 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:22:59 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198955 I’d rather have the Fiat 2000 tbh. It’d be somewhat close to the Medium Mk.I with similar armament.

]]> By: jontheblack http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198875 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:56:18 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198875 That would be a cool premium for Germany. Rather see it at tier 8 though. Seems natural as the counter part to the Tiger II.

]]> By: Medjed http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198863 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:20:19 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198863 Hotchkiss/MicroMaus was already OP with “only” 40mm of armor at T2(!) which forced them to implement Tetrarch as free premium tank to counter those fortresses and now they want to implement T1 tank with 47mm of armor. How retarded can they go?!

]]> By: Kurtzkurak http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198768 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:53:22 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198768 UE tree WHEN????? :D

]]> By: Pietrus http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198762 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:32:41 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198762 Why couldnt they just do an independent Swedish tree? They made more vehicles than the japanese did!

]]> By: buzzkill150 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198743 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:00:50 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198743 No no no no..no more gd autoloading abominations.

]]> By: Karika http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198739 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:49:48 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198739 yeah, there are pretty cool, original and unique stuff in most of the EU nations, such as the Czech Kolohousenka, the Hungarian V-3, the Italian Ansaldo 5 tonne… but no, we’ll get yet another FT-17, like we don’t have enough already. What will come next, more T-54s?

Oh, wait a minute…

]]> By: Vollketten http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/22/yuri-pasholok-qa/#comment-198738 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:45:13 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17409#comment-198738 Couldn’t agree more.
It’s literally the worst possible option imaginable – a fantasy Tier 1 of a mixed tree using a boring (and now immobile) tank which had no relevance at all to the rest of europe. Total gibberish.
Whatever medication he is on I clearly am going to need some soon.

]]>