<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storm Gathers 9.3 Feedback (QA)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nublex</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-200065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nublex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-200065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tank disappear in the middle of the field with camo on, real story, like 300m from viewer is what all you need.

How about tanks that just disappear in the middle of the field without camo on, how is that make sense]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tank disappear in the middle of the field with camo on, real story, like 300m from viewer is what all you need.</p>
<p>How about tanks that just disappear in the middle of the field without camo on, how is that make sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramp4ge</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramp4ge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Veider, when asked why the KV-85 122mm alpha was not nerfed: “Many vehicles have this gun. Should we nerf it for all?”

The only two vehicles that rely on the D-2-5-T are the KV-1S\KV-85 and the SU-100

Both are tier 6 vehicles.

Both are proof that 390 alpha is too high for tier 6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Veider, when asked why the KV-85 122mm alpha was not nerfed: “Many vehicles have this gun. Should we nerf it for all?”</p>
<p>The only two vehicles that rely on the D-2-5-T are the KV-1S\KV-85 and the SU-100</p>
<p>Both are tier 6 vehicles.</p>
<p>Both are proof that 390 alpha is too high for tier 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AesBinz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesBinz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need those tomatoes one way or another, you will hate them on your team but I&#039;m sure you harvest them and very happy to see them on opposite team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need those tomatoes one way or another, you will hate them on your team but I&#8217;m sure you harvest them and very happy to see them on opposite team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AesBinz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesBinz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They won&#039;t buff 13-90 and wz, so you&#039;ll be forced to spend for xp convert to use those new lights.  Then after a while will either buff the old LT or nerf the new LT.  cycles repeat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They won&#8217;t buff 13-90 and wz, so you&#8217;ll be forced to spend for xp convert to use those new lights.  Then after a while will either buff the old LT or nerf the new LT.  cycles repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boombeartreeNA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boombeartreeNA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[storm doesn&#039;t watch mlp? someone needs to fix that :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>storm doesn&#8217;t watch mlp? someone needs to fix that :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vixatious</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vixatious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Looks like AW needs hit them hard on rear to made them do what players want&quot;

Correction, to make WG do what YOU and a few band of idiots want. Skill MM is a shit idea.

In essence, it doesn&#039;t mean shit if you say that the AMX 13-90 and WZ 132 are under performers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Looks like AW needs hit them hard on rear to made them do what players want&#8221;</p>
<p>Correction, to make WG do what YOU and a few band of idiots want. Skill MM is a shit idea.</p>
<p>In essence, it doesn&#8217;t mean shit if you say that the AMX 13-90 and WZ 132 are under performers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hue</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Efficiency in 2014?
8700?
What the fuck, retard, not only is that value entirely obsolete and broken, but 8700 would make you the SINGLE best player in the game. Nice believable story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Efficiency in 2014?<br />
8700?<br />
What the fuck, retard, not only is that value entirely obsolete and broken, but 8700 would make you the SINGLE best player in the game. Nice believable story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remiska</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[remiska]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And Tell me (if you have children&#039;s or much younger-about 10 years-brother) do you watch with him cartoons and if you do so you enjoy them? I for example do coz they are funny relaxing you don&#039;t have to concentrate on plot just enjoy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Tell me (if you have children&#8217;s or much younger-about 10 years-brother) do you watch with him cartoons and if you do so you enjoy them? I for example do coz they are funny relaxing you don&#8217;t have to concentrate on plot just enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schepel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schepel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You and many others, miss the point of a skill MM. It should make fore more interesting games. Personally, I do not particularly enjoy onesided games. There is little fun in trashing deep red noobs who have no clue and getting trashed because your team is deep red is not really all that rewarding, either. Balanced games, not necessarily with everybody of the same level, are much better. In the end, I play this game to enjoy it, to relish the challenge. If I get to play high quality matches, I could not care less about my WR dropping back to 50%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and many others, miss the point of a skill MM. It should make fore more interesting games. Personally, I do not particularly enjoy onesided games. There is little fun in trashing deep red noobs who have no clue and getting trashed because your team is deep red is not really all that rewarding, either. Balanced games, not necessarily with everybody of the same level, are much better. In the end, I play this game to enjoy it, to relish the challenge. If I get to play high quality matches, I could not care less about my WR dropping back to 50%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand Porsche</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/24/storm-gathers-9-3-feedback-qa/#comment-199566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Porsche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17468#comment-199566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOT menchanics are good if you learn to use them to your advantage, which is kinda the point if you play for real. If you fail in understanding and use this mechanics to your advantage then gtfo and dont blame the game. All mechanics does make sense if you know how to play the game, they make sense to 100 fucking percent. Want realism the play WT, which was supposed to be a &quot;simulator&quot;, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOT menchanics are good if you learn to use them to your advantage, which is kinda the point if you play for real. If you fail in understanding and use this mechanics to your advantage then gtfo and dont blame the game. All mechanics does make sense if you know how to play the game, they make sense to 100 fucking percent. Want realism the play WT, which was supposed to be a &#8220;simulator&#8221;, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
