<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 25.9.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand Porsche</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Porsche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No tier 9 needs a buff. Not even the T54 which many people claim has &quot;bad pen&quot;, what they dont realise is that a second gun is avalable which has 219mm pen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No tier 9 needs a buff. Not even the T54 which many people claim has &#8220;bad pen&#8221;, what they dont realise is that a second gun is avalable which has 219mm pen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand Porsche</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Porsche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, all evidence shows that long range fighting/view range will only be beneficial for TDs or other vehicles with good camo/view range and penetration/alpha/accuracy. That is why arties was so popular back then, make damage from long range taking little risk, and after 8.6, TDs.

The reason TDs are not overpopulated anymore (even though they are as high or higher in numbers than heavys or mediums) is because maps has changed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, all evidence shows that long range fighting/view range will only be beneficial for TDs or other vehicles with good camo/view range and penetration/alpha/accuracy. That is why arties was so popular back then, make damage from long range taking little risk, and after 8.6, TDs.</p>
<p>The reason TDs are not overpopulated anymore (even though they are as high or higher in numbers than heavys or mediums) is because maps has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand Porsche</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Porsche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many tanks have historical modules as in historical projects. The idea of tank balance in wot in relation to tire is that all tanks should damage eachother and that works pretty well now. Having tanks in stock configurations would heavily reduce grinding and money spent. Even WT has introduced historicaly projects, as in tanks can mount modules that only existed in blueprints.

WOT is a vehicle based shooter, just like battlefield. You play to unlock parts on the vehicle/weapon and that is a very fundamental part of all games.

As it is now, game balance has never been any better in WOT. Accuracy is good, the amount of TDs and arty are lower and the maps are more &quot;brawler&quot; friendly as well as new tier 8 scouts that are more potential. Some OP tanks has been nerfed like kv1s, hellcat and T57. I dont think we have seen any better balance since 8.6, which fucked up the game and turned it into a camperfest (because former map design heavily favoured TDs).

So yes I do consider that the state of the game in terms of game balance is pretty damn good now. What is not good is that every patch introduce new bugs and fps drops, as well as too many noobs playing higher tiers (because its much more easy to obtain high tier tanks no, with the credit and xp buff for prem tenks).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many tanks have historical modules as in historical projects. The idea of tank balance in wot in relation to tire is that all tanks should damage eachother and that works pretty well now. Having tanks in stock configurations would heavily reduce grinding and money spent. Even WT has introduced historicaly projects, as in tanks can mount modules that only existed in blueprints.</p>
<p>WOT is a vehicle based shooter, just like battlefield. You play to unlock parts on the vehicle/weapon and that is a very fundamental part of all games.</p>
<p>As it is now, game balance has never been any better in WOT. Accuracy is good, the amount of TDs and arty are lower and the maps are more &#8220;brawler&#8221; friendly as well as new tier 8 scouts that are more potential. Some OP tanks has been nerfed like kv1s, hellcat and T57. I dont think we have seen any better balance since 8.6, which fucked up the game and turned it into a camperfest (because former map design heavily favoured TDs).</p>
<p>So yes I do consider that the state of the game in terms of game balance is pretty damn good now. What is not good is that every patch introduce new bugs and fps drops, as well as too many noobs playing higher tiers (because its much more easy to obtain high tier tanks no, with the credit and xp buff for prem tenks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand Porsche</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Porsche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, but no skills or perks are realistic. What is un realistic is that a crew member automaticly teach himself 6th sense when reaching 100% and no other skills. Because that us what WG wants to do right? Make 6th sesne default when member reach 100%. Kinda unfair for those who have spend gold to reset skills or train it from the first beginning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but no skills or perks are realistic. What is un realistic is that a crew member automaticly teach himself 6th sense when reaching 100% and no other skills. Because that us what WG wants to do right? Make 6th sesne default when member reach 100%. Kinda unfair for those who have spend gold to reset skills or train it from the first beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand Porsche</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferdinand Porsche]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New maps are remade to make former open spaces more secure and former small chokepoints has been opened up with several &quot;corridiors&quot;. That is a fact. Only people who complain are TDs and those who were used to bushwank and make damage that way. Now you need to be closer to the battle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New maps are remade to make former open spaces more secure and former small chokepoints has been opened up with several &#8220;corridiors&#8221;. That is a fact. Only people who complain are TDs and those who were used to bushwank and make damage that way. Now you need to be closer to the battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreadmoth</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dreadmoth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching the replay of that same game, running with max settings at 3840x2160, peak VRAM usage was 1990MB.

I wish more parts of the UI other than just the map were scalable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the replay of that same game, running with max settings at 3840&#215;2160, peak VRAM usage was 1990MB.</p>
<p>I wish more parts of the UI other than just the map were scalable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyuesp</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joyuesp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wtf, steppes are just 3 corridors, try to get out of them and you will be spotted an killed quick.
malinovka? the corridor near the water is very recent and has improved the gameplay in that area, also the hill was reworked into another corridor so people down there couldnt hit you.

seems people just want trenches and no mans land to kill bots getting out of cover, ww1 style.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtf, steppes are just 3 corridors, try to get out of them and you will be spotted an killed quick.<br />
malinovka? the corridor near the water is very recent and has improved the gameplay in that area, also the hill was reworked into another corridor so people down there couldnt hit you.</p>
<p>seems people just want trenches and no mans land to kill bots getting out of cover, ww1 style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyuesp</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joyuesp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[t9 is7 hahahahaha]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>t9 is7 hahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nefertum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nefertum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 07:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what looks awesome that you can play wot copy only with modern tanks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what looks awesome that you can play wot copy only with modern tanks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orfiel</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/25/25-9-2014/#comment-200422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orfiel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 04:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17502#comment-200422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re interested about your tanks, you will find your info.

If you&#039;re not interested about your tanks, you will not find the info (even if it&#039;s shoved into your face) and never get better.

Some noobs stay as noobs. Some noobs want to get better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested about your tanks, you will find your info.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not interested about your tanks, you will not find the info (even if it&#8217;s shoved into your face) and never get better.</p>
<p>Some noobs stay as noobs. Some noobs want to get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
