<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 28.9.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[overmatch is broken in game, contrary to whatever shit WG devs spews]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>overmatch is broken in game, contrary to whatever shit WG devs spews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillermo Lovato</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guillermo Lovato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i already found a new game to play, i&#039;ve stopped playing wot on 9.0 and was on a death spiral waaay before that when i realized the game keeps getting worse and that each &quot;patch&quot; ruins it more.

You know why people struggle to understand?, because the mechanics are unrealistic SHIT that are counterintuitive and unreal.
You need a fucking GUIDE to understand the retarded &quot;spotting&quot; mechanic, when there shouldn&#039;t be ANY mechanic: if a tank is in sight, it&#039;s in fucking sight, use your fucking eyes, PERIOD.

terminal ballistic and penetration mechanics can be explained with those short videos, no need to &quot;understand&quot; anything to be effective, the hordes of shit reds use the &quot;green=shoot&quot; and don&#039;t give a fuck about mechanics anyway because it doesn&#039;t get more retarded and simplified than WOT where a armor penetration &quot;reduces&quot; some fantasy stupid HP pool.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i already found a new game to play, i&#8217;ve stopped playing wot on 9.0 and was on a death spiral waaay before that when i realized the game keeps getting worse and that each &#8220;patch&#8221; ruins it more.</p>
<p>You know why people struggle to understand?, because the mechanics are unrealistic SHIT that are counterintuitive and unreal.<br />
You need a fucking GUIDE to understand the retarded &#8220;spotting&#8221; mechanic, when there shouldn&#8217;t be ANY mechanic: if a tank is in sight, it&#8217;s in fucking sight, use your fucking eyes, PERIOD.</p>
<p>terminal ballistic and penetration mechanics can be explained with those short videos, no need to &#8220;understand&#8221; anything to be effective, the hordes of shit reds use the &#8220;green=shoot&#8221; and don&#8217;t give a fuck about mechanics anyway because it doesn&#8217;t get more retarded and simplified than WOT where a armor penetration &#8220;reduces&#8221; some fantasy stupid HP pool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavel_p</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pavel_p]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant brawling one as top tier, cause it has alpha, dpm, armor and speed. I dont have it, but I consider it as one of the most dangerous T7 tanks. I can compare T25AT and E25 and imho T25AT is superior due to alpha and penetration combined with good flexibility (not like e25, but still good enough).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant brawling one as top tier, cause it has alpha, dpm, armor and speed. I dont have it, but I consider it as one of the most dangerous T7 tanks. I can compare T25AT and E25 and imho T25AT is superior due to alpha and penetration combined with good flexibility (not like e25, but still good enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R4Ging</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4Ging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and those perfectly visible SU-122-44s are either noobs or good players intentionally letting enemies spot them.

SU-122-44 has very good moving camo, and very good stationary camo. heck, even firing camo is good despite having that huge 122mm gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and those perfectly visible SU-122-44s are either noobs or good players intentionally letting enemies spot them.</p>
<p>SU-122-44 has very good moving camo, and very good stationary camo. heck, even firing camo is good despite having that huge 122mm gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R4Ging</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201674</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4Ging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[maybe AMX 13 75 should also have 400m view range.

its weaker than the other two, but with 400m view range and its very good camo it should be balanced then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe AMX 13 75 should also have 400m view range.</p>
<p>its weaker than the other two, but with 400m view range and its very good camo it should be balanced then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R4Ging</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4Ging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 06:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[as an LT user, imo, unless WG plans to extend the 445m max spotting distance;
all classes except LTs should have 400m base view range at best.

currently, not only are there less and less maps with good scouting spots/areas (many of those that had got reworked), but we also have 410/400m view range meds running optics, plus 400-420m view range TDs with binocs AND camo net.


imagine if we have tier X LTs (with all tanks having their current view range);
*only 10-20m more view range than Batchat 25t, equal to or 10m more than FV4202&#039;s, 10m less or equal to M48A1&#039;s/M60&#039;s.
*speeds around that of the Batchat 25t

*1400-1500 health points (400-300 less than a Batchat 25t)
*guns only as good as T-54&#039;s at best.

for what?
*max camo on-the-move (around 25% more than the mediums&#039; ?)
*better traverse speeds than even T-62A?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as an LT user, imo, unless WG plans to extend the 445m max spotting distance;<br />
all classes except LTs should have 400m base view range at best.</p>
<p>currently, not only are there less and less maps with good scouting spots/areas (many of those that had got reworked), but we also have 410/400m view range meds running optics, plus 400-420m view range TDs with binocs AND camo net.</p>
<p>imagine if we have tier X LTs (with all tanks having their current view range);<br />
*only 10-20m more view range than Batchat 25t, equal to or 10m more than FV4202&#8242;s, 10m less or equal to M48A1&#8242;s/M60&#8242;s.<br />
*speeds around that of the Batchat 25t</p>
<p>*1400-1500 health points (400-300 less than a Batchat 25t)<br />
*guns only as good as T-54&#8242;s at best.</p>
<p>for what?<br />
*max camo on-the-move (around 25% more than the mediums&#8217; ?)<br />
*better traverse speeds than even T-62A?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 05:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh...i&#039;m fairly certain that those players who understand overmatch and use it actively in the game will be able to understand the concept of subcaliber shells as well. 

Also, it would be a much welcome nerf to APCR. A small one, but still nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh&#8230;i&#8217;m fairly certain that those players who understand overmatch and use it actively in the game will be able to understand the concept of subcaliber shells as well. </p>
<p>Also, it would be a much welcome nerf to APCR. A small one, but still nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randomcommenterwithlowIQ</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[randomcommenterwithlowIQ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMX 13 75 is bad as compared to the T71, and the T71 is bad as compared to the M41. 

AMX 13 75 has been twice outmatched and is the worst of the real LTs...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMX 13 75 is bad as compared to the T71, and the T71 is bad as compared to the M41. </p>
<p>AMX 13 75 has been twice outmatched and is the worst of the real LTs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zweilicht</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zweilicht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 22:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, much anger... if thats really how you feel about WOT, I suggest its past time to find a new game to play...

oh and you guys do realise just how many people struggle to understand the current mechanics? and you think it should be made more complex? we have tomatoes because they cant understand the mechanics, your ranting about tomatoes yet you are arguing to create more of them? meh whatever]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, much anger&#8230; if thats really how you feel about WOT, I suggest its past time to find a new game to play&#8230;</p>
<p>oh and you guys do realise just how many people struggle to understand the current mechanics? and you think it should be made more complex? we have tomatoes because they cant understand the mechanics, your ranting about tomatoes yet you are arguing to create more of them? meh whatever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pavel_p</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/09/28/28-9-2014/#comment-201662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pavel_p]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 22:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17647#comment-201662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my opinion they are balanced, cause walker bulldog is as good as tier 8 mediums, T37 is nearly as good as tier 7 mediums (i think T20 or T-34-1 are better) and they have same MM. So why not.
Btw T71 was considered OP when it was introduced and there was whine how superior it is against AMX 13 75. Then people moved to T57 and unlike KV1S or Hellcat no one played it, cause whole class was underpowered and further nerfed by map changes. 
Now T71 is complete crap compared to Walker Bulldog. Not even mentioning Type62 that is like worse T37 with higher alpha tier higher (same penetration, more hp, extreme chance of exploding or catching fire)
I think leaving new LTs as they are, some better, some worse (every branch has bad tanks) and buffing old ones is better idea.

Only problem I see with new LTs is, that they are pretty annoying. Like E25. It is probably not better TD than T25AT, but people don&#039;t understand why are they killed by invisible tanks while being killed by perfectly visible SU-122-44 is ok.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion they are balanced, cause walker bulldog is as good as tier 8 mediums, T37 is nearly as good as tier 7 mediums (i think T20 or T-34-1 are better) and they have same MM. So why not.<br />
Btw T71 was considered OP when it was introduced and there was whine how superior it is against AMX 13 75. Then people moved to T57 and unlike KV1S or Hellcat no one played it, cause whole class was underpowered and further nerfed by map changes.<br />
Now T71 is complete crap compared to Walker Bulldog. Not even mentioning Type62 that is like worse T37 with higher alpha tier higher (same penetration, more hp, extreme chance of exploding or catching fire)<br />
I think leaving new LTs as they are, some better, some worse (every branch has bad tanks) and buffing old ones is better idea.</p>
<p>Only problem I see with new LTs is, that they are pretty annoying. Like E25. It is probably not better TD than T25AT, but people don&#8217;t understand why are they killed by invisible tanks while being killed by perfectly visible SU-122-44 is ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
