Comments on: 29.9.2014

By: pavel_p

pavel_p — Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:45:11 +0000

No, kids playing end tiers are below 40%. On mid tiers, afk churchill in tier 7 battle makes nearly no difference (this tank hardly moves to contribute in battles lasting below 5 minutes anyway, even as top tier), on tier X, it’s always one top tier tank less. Check Rambo1958 on noobmeter.
Btw I always wonder what is average wn8 and wn8 of top 25% of players. For me it’s hard to have 1500 on midtiers (perhaps not even 1200 if i don’t like the tank – like IS), 2000 is doable in low tier TDs, high tier mediums and light tanks.

By: Nya-chan Production

Nya-chan Production — Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:51:58 +0000

I am not talking about “large number of winrates”, but about average.

But since you base your observation on a single game I think it’s useless to talk about statistics with you…

By: iMrMalibuZ

iMrMalibuZ — Tue, 30 Sep 2014 06:41:58 +0000

Pls tell us again whos reading challenged.. Lool at it 7% below (!) 47% followed by 77% between 48% and 52%. Leaving the said 16% but wait they aint above 52% since the people with a Winrate of 47

By: Fedaykin89

Fedaykin89 — Tue, 30 Sep 2014 03:42:35 +0000

Well I was worried that the mission reward will bypass the acc crew training and just force the 50k XP on the tank….

By: Nadeah

Nadeah — Tue, 30 Sep 2014 02:06:19 +0000

Dreadful tank. Seriously, the only significant thing it has over the T-34-85 is DPM, I didn’t even bother grinding my statistics toward 50% after I elite’d it. ( and got T-44 )

Okay, better hull armour but not strong enough to bounce anything intentionally. More Mobile but still feels about as sluggish. Worse turret frontally; because the bad gun depression and higher tier wasn’t bad enough. I’d drive my A-44 on Hidden Village over this and an A-44 on hidden village is more than just awful.

By: LaterTimeLord

LaterTimeLord — Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:32:15 +0000

You guys don’t know what a real corridor-y city map is… Check Pripyat, and you’ll see what I mean.

By: Evanescence

Evanescence — Mon, 29 Sep 2014 21:00:37 +0000

Don’t forget corridors. A new map without corridors is like WoT without tomatoes…

UNREAL

By: soy_yo_soy_yo

soy_yo_soy_yo — Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:29:50 +0000

I won my first 19 battles on my T-43 hahahhah

By: Maciej Gorzkowski

Maciej Gorzkowski — Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:19:25 +0000

we have 7% under 47% and 77 between 48-52 leaving 16 over 52.
assuming that all those guys between 48 and 52 balance each other out you have

there are few ways to get such distribution:
1. a lot of battles with uneven number of players (for example 15 vs 1 CW battle) – unlikely, even hardcore cw players rarely play more then few percent of their battles in CW and even there most of those are normal battles
2. Bad players play a lot more battles then good players – if 1 player with 45% plays the same amount of battles as 2 players with 55% then it works
3. Variant of the above – good players drop from the game faster then bad players, so bad players continue while good players stop playing after some number of matches making place for another good player.

Also – does it mean there are some players between those 7% (under 47) and 77% (48-52) or not?

I still would say I can believe in 7% players with WR below 45, but 47 seems surprising

By: crash_core

crash_core — Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:22:43 +0000

hell yea (◣_◢)