<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Outta Supertest: T95E2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: R4Ging</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-204156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4Ging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 11:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-204156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the only thing the FCM 50t has going for is its pen. THAT&#039;s why it gets pref. MM.

while this new tank may not seem as good as the FCM 50t, especially because of that 173 pen, remember that this is a medium tank. the FCM 50t is a heavy tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only thing the FCM 50t has going for is its pen. THAT&#8217;s why it gets pref. MM.</p>
<p>while this new tank may not seem as good as the FCM 50t, especially because of that 173 pen, remember that this is a medium tank. the FCM 50t is a heavy tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R4Ging</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-204153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R4Ging]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 11:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-204153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SuperPershing is a bad tank, which is exactly why its very cheap.

if this new tank (which may not even have pref. MM) is not good enough to make the Super Pershing useless, then it may as well be garbage.
be glad if it does make the Super Pershing useless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SuperPershing is a bad tank, which is exactly why its very cheap.</p>
<p>if this new tank (which may not even have pref. MM) is not good enough to make the Super Pershing useless, then it may as well be garbage.<br />
be glad if it does make the Super Pershing useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Abney</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Abney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[agreed. This mothballs the SuperPershing. And it being a &#039;reward&#039; tank it will have better stats than something you can buy. WTF WG can screw themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed. This mothballs the SuperPershing. And it being a &#8216;reward&#8217; tank it will have better stats than something you can buy. WTF WG can screw themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IN33DAMM0</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IN33DAMM0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lol you must not know how to play it then. You can farm more credits in it then any other tank. High DPM and good armor = creds.

But to each there own.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol you must not know how to play it then. You can farm more credits in it then any other tank. High DPM and good armor = creds.</p>
<p>But to each there own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polemarchos</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Polemarchos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I wasn&#039;t saying it wasn&#039;t made in real life! Real life or in game, that turret looks funny on that hull!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wasn&#8217;t saying it wasn&#8217;t made in real life! Real life or in game, that turret looks funny on that hull!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mauschen04</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauschen04]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People like you are why morons think the T69 needs to run gold exclusively.

The Pershing has 180 penetration. The T-44 can be easily used with silver rounds if you simply learn to aim. This literally is par penetration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like you are why morons think the T69 needs to run gold exclusively.</p>
<p>The Pershing has 180 penetration. The T-44 can be easily used with silver rounds if you simply learn to aim. This literally is par penetration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymoususer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymoususer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This better be a premium tank. The reward exclusivity bullsht has to stop!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This better be a premium tank. The reward exclusivity bullsht has to stop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleverTech</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CleverTech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just thought some of you might be interested, but today I went in a battle in my Lorr. 155 50 and on my team I saw someone with an unusual nickname: &quot;7bMushu [WG-A] RU&quot;.
When I looked at his service record I noticed he had some... rare... tanks, like the T95E6, Object 907, SU-76l, and the T-44-85. Just thought you might be interested in seeing how they look, so here you go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought some of you might be interested, but today I went in a battle in my Lorr. 155 50 and on my team I saw someone with an unusual nickname: &#8220;7bMushu [WG-A] RU&#8221;.<br />
When I looked at his service record I noticed he had some&#8230; rare&#8230; tanks, like the T95E6, Object 907, SU-76l, and the T-44-85. Just thought you might be interested in seeing how they look, so here you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j338u5</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j338u5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tank in the picture is a T95E8 with the low silhouette commanders hatch.
Oddly enough while the pictures and drawing in Hunnicutts Abrams show the E2 with the larger commanders hatch the only (at least to my knowledge) surviving E2 doesn&#039;t seem to have it :
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/T-95_tank.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tank in the picture is a T95E8 with the low silhouette commanders hatch.<br />
Oddly enough while the pictures and drawing in Hunnicutts Abrams show the E2 with the larger commanders hatch the only (at least to my knowledge) surviving E2 doesn&#8217;t seem to have it :<br />
<a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/T-95_tank.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/T-95_tank.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j338u5</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/03/straight-outta-supertest-t95e2/#comment-203839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j338u5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 10:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17827#comment-203839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T95E2 (and E8) is tier material anyway. 
For tier 10 (where the other T95 variants belong) there are still the E5 (same as this but with an 105mm M68) and the E7 (a T95 turret with an 105mm L7). There is also a version of the XM60: a M60 hull with a slightly modified T95E6 turret and a 120mm T123E6.

There are enough tanks for the rest of the branch: an M4A3 with a Pershing turret for tier 7, the T42 for tier 8 and the T54E2 for tier 9.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The T95E2 (and E8) is tier material anyway.<br />
For tier 10 (where the other T95 variants belong) there are still the E5 (same as this but with an 105mm M68) and the E7 (a T95 turret with an 105mm L7). There is also a version of the XM60: a M60 hull with a slightly modified T95E6 turret and a 120mm T123E6.</p>
<p>There are enough tanks for the rest of the branch: an M4A3 with a Pershing turret for tier 7, the T42 for tier 8 and the T54E2 for tier 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
