<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And the Third World of Warships Tree is&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dziban Molniya</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-205752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dziban Molniya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-205752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was trying to think of any engagements the Soviet Navy participated in during WW2. Now, it&#039;s true I&#039;m not an expert in Soviet naval matters by any stretch, but I couldn&#039;t think of a single one. The only action I could come up with was the fighting near Sevastapol when Soviet destroyers and cruisers ferried marines to an amphibious landing, and I&#039;m not sure where I heard that.

Did they even escort any of the convoys to Murmansk?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to think of any engagements the Soviet Navy participated in during WW2. Now, it&#8217;s true I&#8217;m not an expert in Soviet naval matters by any stretch, but I couldn&#8217;t think of a single one. The only action I could come up with was the fighting near Sevastapol when Soviet destroyers and cruisers ferried marines to an amphibious landing, and I&#8217;m not sure where I heard that.</p>
<p>Did they even escort any of the convoys to Murmansk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-205322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 00:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-205322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dun relly caaaaare. want Yamato. will blow all oppozhition to hell.
*insert aggro asian face*

(DISCLAIMER: no you can&#039;t claim racist vs me. im asian. a very aggro one.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dun relly caaaaare. want Yamato. will blow all oppozhition to hell.<br />
*insert aggro asian face*</p>
<p>(DISCLAIMER: no you can&#8217;t claim racist vs me. im asian. a very aggro one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Variavespasa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-205312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Variavespasa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-205312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh-huh.  The IS-7 is #19 out of 32 tier 10 tanks (not including the 2 clan-wars tanks).  Thats not even in the top half.  If its not winning well, and it isnt, then it is, by definition, NOT overpowered, and you&#039;re a pillock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh-huh.  The IS-7 is #19 out of 32 tier 10 tanks (not including the 2 clan-wars tanks).  Thats not even in the top half.  If its not winning well, and it isnt, then it is, by definition, NOT overpowered, and you&#8217;re a pillock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bailey</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-205045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Bailey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 11:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-205045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of demonstrating your lack of historical knowledge why not tell us what, exactly, is so good about the Soviet Navy between the 1920&#039;s and the 1970&#039;s that warrants it even having its own ship line?

HMS Hood was not a Battleship, it was a Battlecruiser: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Hood_(51)
Due to poor ship design it was not suited for engaging ships of the calibre of the Bismarck. It was an extremely lucky shot that caused its destruction, aided by a design that sacrificed protection from plunging fire in order to keep the tonnage down.
The IJN turned the Pacific into their own pond for the first months of the war, not even the USN ventured into the western pacific until the later stages of 1942.
The PoW and Repulse were sunk as much by Japanese planes as by the rank stupidity of the Admiralty that issued their orders.
The Swordfish torpedo bomber caused the demise of the Bismark, one of the most advanced capital ships at the outbreak of WWII. Please note that they flew from Aircraft Carriers of the Royal Navy. Soviet Aircraft Carriers?

The British Navy provided convoy escort in the Atlantic as well as on the North Cape route to the Soviet Union. Without that the Soviet Union would not have had the help it so desperately needed.
The British Navy single handedly kept the German, French and Italian Navies in check in the Atlantic, North and Mediterranean Seas. In addition they provided Capital ships, Aircraft Carriers and various other fleet components to aid the Americans in the Pacific Oceans.

Where was the Soviet Fleet during this time? Only existed on paper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of demonstrating your lack of historical knowledge why not tell us what, exactly, is so good about the Soviet Navy between the 1920&#8242;s and the 1970&#8242;s that warrants it even having its own ship line?</p>
<p>HMS Hood was not a Battleship, it was a Battlecruiser: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Hood_(51)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Hood_(51)</a><br />
Due to poor ship design it was not suited for engaging ships of the calibre of the Bismarck. It was an extremely lucky shot that caused its destruction, aided by a design that sacrificed protection from plunging fire in order to keep the tonnage down.<br />
The IJN turned the Pacific into their own pond for the first months of the war, not even the USN ventured into the western pacific until the later stages of 1942.<br />
The PoW and Repulse were sunk as much by Japanese planes as by the rank stupidity of the Admiralty that issued their orders.<br />
The Swordfish torpedo bomber caused the demise of the Bismark, one of the most advanced capital ships at the outbreak of WWII. Please note that they flew from Aircraft Carriers of the Royal Navy. Soviet Aircraft Carriers?</p>
<p>The British Navy provided convoy escort in the Atlantic as well as on the North Cape route to the Soviet Union. Without that the Soviet Union would not have had the help it so desperately needed.<br />
The British Navy single handedly kept the German, French and Italian Navies in check in the Atlantic, North and Mediterranean Seas. In addition they provided Capital ships, Aircraft Carriers and various other fleet components to aid the Americans in the Pacific Oceans.</p>
<p>Where was the Soviet Fleet during this time? Only existed on paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dxzit</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-204871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dxzit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-204871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much butthurt in you. 

This whole thing is about developed tech trees for the game, you mental inbreed, not what actions they undertook.
Try thinking with your brain and farting out your ass, not the other way around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much butthurt in you. </p>
<p>This whole thing is about developed tech trees for the game, you mental inbreed, not what actions they undertook.<br />
Try thinking with your brain and farting out your ass, not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonigus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-204864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lonigus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-204864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can smell hers arrogance across the Atlantic ocen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can smell hers arrogance across the Atlantic ocen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonigus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-204863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lonigus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-204863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once a bitch, always a bitch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once a bitch, always a bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lonigus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-204861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lonigus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-204861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are talking about the Russian brah... Please try to read between the lines... its not rocket science...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are talking about the Russian brah&#8230; Please try to read between the lines&#8230; its not rocket science&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KtW</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-204853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KtW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 07:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-204853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a FtR post 28th of May 2013:

&quot;The 2012 reported revenue for Wargaming was broken down in the following way in their Annual
Report. (Was in Euros, changed it to U.S funds and made it simple to read)

Overall Revenue 281 million,  Broken down into..


168.9 million -  Russian Server
  70.0 million - European server
  39.7 million - U.S Server
    2.4 million - Sea Server

Now compare that to active players closer to the time of the report (Pulled Dec 01, 2012)


3,034,756 - Russian Server
   845,528 - European server
   195,340 - U.S Server
     62,225 - Sea Server


That means that that for the average active player they made roughly the following per month..
  $4.64 - Russian Server
  $6.90 - European server
$16.94 - U.S Server
  $3.21 - Sea Server

So it supports them saying American&#039;s spend more, which it clearly shows per active user, just the American server has 1/15th of the active users they have on the Russian server. The bulk of the revenue is still the Russian servers due to the extremely high active user count.&quot;

EU freeloaders do not think so. Majority of money form Russia followed by EU then US.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a FtR post 28th of May 2013:</p>
<p>&#8220;The 2012 reported revenue for Wargaming was broken down in the following way in their Annual<br />
Report. (Was in Euros, changed it to U.S funds and made it simple to read)</p>
<p>Overall Revenue 281 million,  Broken down into..</p>
<p>168.9 million &#8211;  Russian Server<br />
  70.0 million &#8211; European server<br />
  39.7 million &#8211; U.S Server<br />
    2.4 million &#8211; Sea Server</p>
<p>Now compare that to active players closer to the time of the report (Pulled Dec 01, 2012)</p>
<p>3,034,756 &#8211; Russian Server<br />
   845,528 &#8211; European server<br />
   195,340 &#8211; U.S Server<br />
     62,225 &#8211; Sea Server</p>
<p>That means that that for the average active player they made roughly the following per month..<br />
  $4.64 &#8211; Russian Server<br />
  $6.90 &#8211; European server<br />
$16.94 &#8211; U.S Server<br />
  $3.21 &#8211; Sea Server</p>
<p>So it supports them saying American&#8217;s spend more, which it clearly shows per active user, just the American server has 1/15th of the active users they have on the Russian server. The bulk of the revenue is still the Russian servers due to the extremely high active user count.&#8221;</p>
<p>EU freeloaders do not think so. Majority of money form Russia followed by EU then US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exocet6951</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/06/and-the-third-world-of-warships-tree-is/#comment-204852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exocet6951]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 06:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=17899#comment-204852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HMS Hood might have to disagree with you...
It wasn&#039;t as big as the Pacific, but it had its moments, and given the importance of navies and ships, massive bombing raids on ports and docks, stealth missions to sabotage ships, and trying to get allied navies to scuttle their own ships before the enemy gets to them....

It wasn&#039;t the key factor in the war, I&#039;ll grant you that (the Germans really did suck), but it has such cultural importance, that not considering it equal in terms of significance today with the Pacific is, in my opinion, a mistake.
Especially for a majoritarly European (politically and geographically) demographic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The HMS Hood might have to disagree with you&#8230;<br />
It wasn&#8217;t as big as the Pacific, but it had its moments, and given the importance of navies and ships, massive bombing raids on ports and docks, stealth missions to sabotage ships, and trying to get allied navies to scuttle their own ships before the enemy gets to them&#8230;.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t the key factor in the war, I&#8217;ll grant you that (the Germans really did suck), but it has such cultural importance, that not considering it equal in terms of significance today with the Pacific is, in my opinion, a mistake.<br />
Especially for a majoritarly European (politically and geographically) demographic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
