<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Straight Outta Supertest: Object 260 and T28 Armor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also T28 concept did have plans made for it, they just were not posted when Hannicut wrote his book. 

In the end the MG tumors where most likely gonna be hydraulic just like the B17 belly guns. 

In other words they should be 1 shot hitbox`s. 

WG needs to get on it about 1 hit hitboxes already, so many weakspot on US tanks would be one hittable and then do nothing as that part would be gone with no real loss of function.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also T28 concept did have plans made for it, they just were not posted when Hannicut wrote his book. </p>
<p>In the end the MG tumors where most likely gonna be hydraulic just like the B17 belly guns. </p>
<p>In other words they should be 1 shot hitbox`s. </p>
<p>WG needs to get on it about 1 hit hitboxes already, so many weakspot on US tanks would be one hittable and then do nothing as that part would be gone with no real loss of function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 00:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WTF do they make gift tanks basically T10`s with T9 guns?

I understand making Premiums not as OP as reg tanks but gift tanks should be 100% as powerful as regular tanks as they are in such small numbers they cant hurt the meta. 

I mean I understand not making them OP machines but look at the M60, it is better than the M48 in all ways except camo and it isnt game breaking at all, not even close to it.

All gift tanks should be bad ass for there tier, they certainly dont make big creds, all they do is train crews. 

But 907+260 are almost useless as they have T9 guns and 260 is more like a T8 gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF do they make gift tanks basically T10`s with T9 guns?</p>
<p>I understand making Premiums not as OP as reg tanks but gift tanks should be 100% as powerful as regular tanks as they are in such small numbers they cant hurt the meta. </p>
<p>I mean I understand not making them OP machines but look at the M60, it is better than the M48 in all ways except camo and it isnt game breaking at all, not even close to it.</p>
<p>All gift tanks should be bad ass for there tier, they certainly dont make big creds, all they do is train crews. </p>
<p>But 907+260 are almost useless as they have T9 guns and 260 is more like a T8 gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ComradeHX</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ComradeHX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 19:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would be more worried about the shot trap than the 250mm thick mantlet.

It should work relatively well considering HEAT mechanics; all the premium rounds will fail when they hit the mantlet, and most of the AP and APCR capable of reliably penning the mantlet are not really that accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be more worried about the shot trap than the 250mm thick mantlet.</p>
<p>It should work relatively well considering HEAT mechanics; all the premium rounds will fail when they hit the mantlet, and most of the AP and APCR capable of reliably penning the mantlet are not really that accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiger61378</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tiger61378]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the T28 Concept is based on a wooden mockup that was made during the design phase of the T28/T95 project...so its still far more real than the WTFE100 which is just WG doodling on a napkin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the T28 Concept is based on a wooden mockup that was made during the design phase of the T28/T95 project&#8230;so its still far more real than the WTFE100 which is just WG doodling on a napkin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceCadet29</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpaceCadet29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They don&#039;t look that weak... They&#039;re rounded, so they&#039;ll be much bouncier than the kv-5&#039;s r2d2, and the armor around them appears to be 101mm thick. That should be plenty for a tier vii. It looks comparable to the AT-7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t look that weak&#8230; They&#8217;re rounded, so they&#8217;ll be much bouncier than the kv-5&#8242;s r2d2, and the armor around them appears to be 101mm thick. That should be plenty for a tier vii. It looks comparable to the AT-7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foxton</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foxton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If that T28 concept is real, then so is the carved wooden phoenix I had when I was little.

It isn&#039;t even a blueprint drawing with any kind of information, the WTE100 is more real because at least that has the E-100&#039;s chassis (which we have info on) and wasn&#039;t something a bored intern carved one day.

Seriously though it really just looks like a concept of what someone thought &quot;the future of tanks&quot; was to be, rather than any concerted effort to make a real tank design. Like the difference between the stylised &#039;50s and the Saturn V.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that T28 concept is real, then so is the carved wooden phoenix I had when I was little.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t even a blueprint drawing with any kind of information, the WTE100 is more real because at least that has the E-100&#8242;s chassis (which we have info on) and wasn&#8217;t something a bored intern carved one day.</p>
<p>Seriously though it really just looks like a concept of what someone thought &#8220;the future of tanks&#8221; was to be, rather than any concerted effort to make a real tank design. Like the difference between the stylised &#8217;50s and the Saturn V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foxton</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207199</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foxton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you not see the three 60mm tumours on top of the tank? The armour&#039;s a gimmick no decent player could be fooled by.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you not see the three 60mm tumours on top of the tank? The armour&#8217;s a gimmick no decent player could be fooled by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Info ze supertestu: Pancíř Objekt 260 a T28 Concept</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Info ze supertestu: Pancíř Objekt 260 a T28 Concept]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Zdroj: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Zdroj: <a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberMaroon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CyberMaroon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that&#039;s dark yellow, so it&#039;s a 50mm zone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s dark yellow, so it&#8217;s a 50mm zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xCaptainObviousx</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/11/straight-outta-supertest-object-260-and-t28-armor/#comment-207146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xCaptainObviousx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18150#comment-207146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also like the 40 mm upper plate, Russian tanks from t7 and up will have a field day with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the 40 mm upper plate, Russian tanks from t7 and up will have a field day with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
