<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regarding the Sherman Fury Armor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fury &#124; Curation Club</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-210012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fury &#124; Curation Club]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-210012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] 15 October 2014 &#124; 10:24 am Hello everyone,. as you probably know by now, there&#039;s a Sherman Fury in the game (a tier 6 premium medium tank). It&#039;s being sold on ASIA server (not sure about the US, it&#039;s not on EU yet however). It is no secret that the Fury&#160;&#8230; http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 15 October 2014 | 10:24 am Hello everyone,. as you probably know by now, there&#039;s a Sherman Fury in the game (a tier 6 premium medium tank). It&#039;s being sold on ASIA server (not sure about the US, it&#039;s not on EU yet however). It is no secret that the Fury&nbsp;&#8230; <a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBadger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JBadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we stop with this thought that HVAP ammo was available like going down to the PX/ 7-11 for slurpees and ohh can I get 20 rounds of HVAP.

Before 1945,only 2-3 of these projectiles were aboard a Sherman, because priority had had been given to Tank Destroyer battalions.

The 10,000 HVAP rounds for 3&quot;/76mm produced in a month did not happen until November 44. It appears that the initial &quot;small quantity&quot; received in the European Theatre of Operations was part of the 1,000 T4 76mm rounds accepted in July. This was followed by the following production (3&quot;/76mm T4)

The M93 round is for the M7 gun of the M10 Tank Destroyer, the T4 is for M1A1 gun (M4/76 ) 

Date: Production M93/ T4
Aug 44 1,000/0 
Sep 44 1,000/1,000 
Oct 44 2,000/1,000 
Nov 44 5,000/5,000 
Dec 44 5,000/5,000 
Jan 45 7,000/6,000 
Feb 45 6,000/6,000 
Mar 45 3,000/9,000 
Apr 45 3,000/5,000 
May 45 Program Complete/6,000 
Jun 45 0/6,000 
Jul 45 0/6,000 
Aug 45 0/6,000

The 76 mm L/52 M1A1 gun performed poor when compared Kwk42 L/70; its APC M61 shell penetrates 89mm at 1000m by 30 degree impact, the German gun Kwk42 L/70 peneterates 111 mm with its PzGr.39. The US gun was only marginally more effective than the former (short barreled) 75mm M3 gun against a Panther&#039;s front armor. It was effective (but still not against the glacis of the Panther) when using the T4 HVAP-T tungsten carbide cored projectile (which could penetrate 134 mm at 1000m)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we stop with this thought that HVAP ammo was available like going down to the PX/ 7-11 for slurpees and ohh can I get 20 rounds of HVAP.</p>
<p>Before 1945,only 2-3 of these projectiles were aboard a Sherman, because priority had had been given to Tank Destroyer battalions.</p>
<p>The 10,000 HVAP rounds for 3&#8243;/76mm produced in a month did not happen until November 44. It appears that the initial &#8220;small quantity&#8221; received in the European Theatre of Operations was part of the 1,000 T4 76mm rounds accepted in July. This was followed by the following production (3&#8243;/76mm T4)</p>
<p>The M93 round is for the M7 gun of the M10 Tank Destroyer, the T4 is for M1A1 gun (M4/76 ) </p>
<p>Date: Production M93/ T4<br />
Aug 44 1,000/0<br />
Sep 44 1,000/1,000<br />
Oct 44 2,000/1,000<br />
Nov 44 5,000/5,000<br />
Dec 44 5,000/5,000<br />
Jan 45 7,000/6,000<br />
Feb 45 6,000/6,000<br />
Mar 45 3,000/9,000<br />
Apr 45 3,000/5,000<br />
May 45 Program Complete/6,000<br />
Jun 45 0/6,000<br />
Jul 45 0/6,000<br />
Aug 45 0/6,000</p>
<p>The 76 mm L/52 M1A1 gun performed poor when compared Kwk42 L/70; its APC M61 shell penetrates 89mm at 1000m by 30 degree impact, the German gun Kwk42 L/70 peneterates 111 mm with its PzGr.39. The US gun was only marginally more effective than the former (short barreled) 75mm M3 gun against a Panther&#8217;s front armor. It was effective (but still not against the glacis of the Panther) when using the T4 HVAP-T tungsten carbide cored projectile (which could penetrate 134 mm at 1000m)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBadger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JBadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greatest thing about the Fury it comes apart in 3 shots from a Hellcat, KV-85, Tiger 1 and Panther.. Boom Boom Boom. First shot every time: Dead commander, Second dead gunner  third dead tank in flames...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greatest thing about the Fury it comes apart in 3 shots from a Hellcat, KV-85, Tiger 1 and Panther.. Boom Boom Boom. First shot every time: Dead commander, Second dead gunner  third dead tank in flames&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBadger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JBadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Master_Deathdealer should know by the name...LMAO.  But Seriously Really Baddie?  Baddie?? who uses that? how old are you 4 years old, 7 years old. You going to run to the pwinciple and compwain about the other childwen who won&#039;t play with you Randle?.

 Who the Hell uses &quot;Baddie&quot; to describe a player.  Makes you sound like a &quot;Douchey&quot; Little boy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Master_Deathdealer should know by the name&#8230;LMAO.  But Seriously Really Baddie?  Baddie?? who uses that? how old are you 4 years old, 7 years old. You going to run to the pwinciple and compwain about the other childwen who won&#8217;t play with you Randle?.</p>
<p> Who the Hell uses &#8220;Baddie&#8221; to describe a player.  Makes you sound like a &#8220;Douchey&#8221; Little boy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legiondude</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legiondude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;E8`s were August 1944 or later and wouldnt get to Germany until 3 Months later.&quot;

And this matters in a film set in April 1945 because....?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;E8`s were August 1944 or later and wouldnt get to Germany until 3 Months later.&#8221;</p>
<p>And this matters in a film set in April 1945 because&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INRL the later 76mm Sherman was as CHief explained superior to a Tiger in everyway and every bit as good as a Panther and even better since they didnt breakdown.

76mm with HVAP was amazing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INRL the later 76mm Sherman was as CHief explained superior to a Tiger in everyway and every bit as good as a Panther and even better since they didnt breakdown.</p>
<p>76mm with HVAP was amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Mesiroff</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Mesiroff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is Fury even a Easy 8? E8`s were Korea. In reality it would be a A6 or a normal M4A3 76 Sherman. E8`s were August 1944 or later and wouldnt get to Germany until 3 Months later.

The E8`s did have plates behind the mantlets in some configs also BTW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Fury even a Easy 8? E8`s were Korea. In reality it would be a A6 or a normal M4A3 76 Sherman. E8`s were August 1944 or later and wouldnt get to Germany until 3 Months later.</p>
<p>The E8`s did have plates behind the mantlets in some configs also BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaffulMann</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WaffulMann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only time I regret not using the 105mm derp is when I come across an amx 50 100. Those things are scary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only time I regret not using the 105mm derp is when I come across an amx 50 100. Those things are scary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramp4ge</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ramp4ge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 21:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t tell if troll or...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t tell if troll or&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatOneMichaelKid</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/15/regarding-the-sherman-fury-armor/#comment-209023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThatOneMichaelKid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18280#comment-209023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, not sure what they are thinking. I am glad they are making it historical but they should give it preferential mm in order to make it effective.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, not sure what they are thinking. I am glad they are making it historical but they should give it preferential mm in order to make it effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
