<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hungarian Branch in WoT – Part 4: Tas medium tank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karika</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 17:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the 36,6 ton weight is the value that can be found in the books and articles, and I forgot to add an &quot;approx.&quot; before them :) 
This value will be, let&#039;s say, the standard, and the tier 6 vehicle will be for example a little bit lighter? Just a thought, not sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because the 36,6 ton weight is the value that can be found in the books and articles, and I forgot to add an &#8220;approx.&#8221; before them :)<br />
This value will be, let&#8217;s say, the standard, and the tier 6 vehicle will be for example a little bit lighter? Just a thought, not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leveskockaa</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[leveskockaa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice article, again.
I had the same idea with the lower armor, etc. of the Tas prot., but on FTR you can&#039;t comment under very old posts.
High five!/Pacsi!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article, again.<br />
I had the same idea with the lower armor, etc. of the Tas prot., but on FTR you can&#8217;t comment under very old posts.<br />
High five!/Pacsi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roll3r</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roll3r]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article. Good job!
(Jó cikk. A nép, nevében köszönjük szépen!)

The size change is interesting. I like the idea of a more compact panther.
I think the sidescrape inability is not an issue, as a medium with good speed it needs a different play style.
I personally would keep it(both tiers) even if it underperforms in its tier. I still have my beautiful pzIII ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Good job!<br />
(Jó cikk. A nép, nevében köszönjük szépen!)</p>
<p>The size change is interesting. I like the idea of a more compact panther.<br />
I think the sidescrape inability is not an issue, as a medium with good speed it needs a different play style.<br />
I personally would keep it(both tiers) even if it underperforms in its tier. I still have my beautiful pzIII ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YOBA</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[YOBA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why weight is the same for both variants despite obvious difference (100 mm LFP, guns, engines, turret)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why weight is the same for both variants despite obvious difference (100 mm LFP, guns, engines, turret)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC_Thome</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MC_Thome]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Centurion and Caernarvon are tier 8, after all. Same thing goes for the Soviet 122mm guns on the IS, IS3, etc (390 alpha) and IS8, IS4 (440 alpha), or Tiger 2&#039;s 105mm (320 alpha) and the tier 9 and 10 mediums&#039; 105mm (390 alpha). So yeah, alpha isn&#039;t only tied to the gun caliber, but also tier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Centurion and Caernarvon are tier 8, after all. Same thing goes for the Soviet 122mm guns on the IS, IS3, etc (390 alpha) and IS8, IS4 (440 alpha), or Tiger 2&#8242;s 105mm (320 alpha) and the tier 9 and 10 mediums&#8217; 105mm (390 alpha). So yeah, alpha isn&#8217;t only tied to the gun caliber, but also tier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karika</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just like kunjuro said, alpha dmg is not exactly tied to the caliber, so we can not assume exactly how high would be the alpha of an 80mm gun. 
If we compate it to the 76,2mm (17pdr) British and the long 85mm guns of the Soviets, the in between 80mm should be around 150-160. But yes, the 83mm (20pdr) guns have 230 alpha, so the 80mm gun should have 200-ish alpha instead? I don&#039;t know, the developers will decide.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like kunjuro said, alpha dmg is not exactly tied to the caliber, so we can not assume exactly how high would be the alpha of an 80mm gun.<br />
If we compate it to the 76,2mm (17pdr) British and the long 85mm guns of the Soviets, the in between 80mm should be around 150-160. But yes, the 83mm (20pdr) guns have 230 alpha, so the 80mm gun should have 200-ish alpha instead? I don&#8217;t know, the developers will decide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apolloF117 .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[apolloF117 .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[still pointing at the uk comrades, 230 and 6,4s rof :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still pointing at the uk comrades, 230 and 6,4s rof :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karika</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karika]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if it&#039;ll have 150-ish alpha, than it&#039;ll probably have high RoF to compensate it. And if it&#039;ll be somewhat higher, let&#039;s say, 190-ish, than the RoF will be lower. It&#039;s balance stuff, and I&#039;m not an expert in it, I&#039;m just speculating :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it&#8217;ll have 150-ish alpha, than it&#8217;ll probably have high RoF to compensate it. And if it&#8217;ll be somewhat higher, let&#8217;s say, 190-ish, than the RoF will be lower. It&#8217;s balance stuff, and I&#8217;m not an expert in it, I&#8217;m just speculating :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kunjuro</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kunjuro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damage isn&#039;t entirely tied to caliber. The Type 58&#039;s 85mm gun has 160 damage and 128 pen. The T-34/85 has similar stats with its 85mm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damage isn&#8217;t entirely tied to caliber. The Type 58&#8242;s 85mm gun has 160 damage and 128 pen. The T-34/85 has similar stats with its 85mm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex sonny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/10/27/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-4-tas-medium-tank/#comment-213676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex sonny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18587#comment-213676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a hybrid of both, it looks like it has Comet&#039;s speed and gun depression and the armour and gun of a Panther.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a hybrid of both, it looks like it has Comet&#8217;s speed and gun depression and the armour and gun of a Panther.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
