<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.11.2014</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guderian1940</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guderian1940]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I m not angry about him spending anything. I&#039;m just annoyed with Wargaming for letting an asshat who apparently has no people skills to open his mouth in public representing Wargaming. Lets face it...Serb wouldn&#039;t know what customer service was if it bit him on the ass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I m not angry about him spending anything. I&#8217;m just annoyed with Wargaming for letting an asshat who apparently has no people skills to open his mouth in public representing Wargaming. Lets face it&#8230;Serb wouldn&#8217;t know what customer service was if it bit him on the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nossie</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nossie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 17:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Serb.... is that youuuuuuu?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serb&#8230;. is that youuuuuuu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beert</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 14:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;(well, didn’t play it before 8.8, but I know for sure that back then its LFP wasn’t made of cheese)&quot;

As far as I know, the LFP on the mighty King Tiger has always been one big joke. Well, let&#039;s just say its armor in general is rather lackluster. It doesn&#039;t have anything extraordinary to offer in contrast to all the other tier 8 heavy tanks, apart from being a &quot;sniping platform&quot;, but who the hell needs that nowadays anyway with accuracy buff and 1/3 of the teams consisting of tank destroyers? Sold it immediately after unlocking the E-75]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(well, didn’t play it before 8.8, but I know for sure that back then its LFP wasn’t made of cheese)&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as I know, the LFP on the mighty King Tiger has always been one big joke. Well, let&#8217;s just say its armor in general is rather lackluster. It doesn&#8217;t have anything extraordinary to offer in contrast to all the other tier 8 heavy tanks, apart from being a &#8220;sniping platform&#8221;, but who the hell needs that nowadays anyway with accuracy buff and 1/3 of the teams consisting of tank destroyers? Sold it immediately after unlocking the E-75</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctp</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ctp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 08:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn, that russian butthurt article. Funny thing is that people like the moron who wrote it, and people believing it, are just the perfect opponents that USSR would like to face. The brainwashing and ignorance behind that article is just astonishing. Is far from a good read...it&#039;s actually just one more of those ,, bohooo Putin is coming to get you,, bullshit articles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that russian butthurt article. Funny thing is that people like the moron who wrote it, and people believing it, are just the perfect opponents that USSR would like to face. The brainwashing and ignorance behind that article is just astonishing. Is far from a good read&#8230;it&#8217;s actually just one more of those ,, bohooo Putin is coming to get you,, bullshit articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoukouDragon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SoukouDragon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 06:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Partially correct.

The Chi-Ri II is the design which looks like a merger of the Chi-Ri and Chi-To armed with the same type 5 75mm. There is a drawing of it, but I don&#039;t think it is based off of any primary source. So this does match what the devs said about not using it due to lack of an actual drawing. The slope on this drawing is about half way between the slope on the Chi-Ri and production Chi-To, so not much of a slope. 

The Chi-Se had only three features specified from what I have seen. 1. Turret with 105mm cannon. 2. New suspension. 3. Hull similar to the Chi-Ri II. With point three, there is no telling whether or not a real slope, as in something over 45 degrees, was planned. Most likely, progress on the Chi-Se never went far enough to even determine the frontal slope. The sloped version Dai has of the Chi-Se theoretically gets the slope from the sloped Ho-Ri mock up. But there is nothing official about it. Just speculation.

Now there is also the tier 8 candidate Chi-Ri Kai created in the NA forums Japanese thread. Historically, there was no such project. The slope of the Chi-Ri Kai again came from the sloped Ho-Ri mock up. SS may have been thinking about the Chi-Ri Kai since the Chi-Ri II slope is really not much of a slope. An image of the Chi-Ri Kai was made by sp15 to help us visualize it as a possible tier 8 candidate. But in the end, the STA-1 actually existed so the made-up Chi-Ri Kai project was not needed as a tier 8 filler.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Partially correct.</p>
<p>The Chi-Ri II is the design which looks like a merger of the Chi-Ri and Chi-To armed with the same type 5 75mm. There is a drawing of it, but I don&#8217;t think it is based off of any primary source. So this does match what the devs said about not using it due to lack of an actual drawing. The slope on this drawing is about half way between the slope on the Chi-Ri and production Chi-To, so not much of a slope. </p>
<p>The Chi-Se had only three features specified from what I have seen. 1. Turret with 105mm cannon. 2. New suspension. 3. Hull similar to the Chi-Ri II. With point three, there is no telling whether or not a real slope, as in something over 45 degrees, was planned. Most likely, progress on the Chi-Se never went far enough to even determine the frontal slope. The sloped version Dai has of the Chi-Se theoretically gets the slope from the sloped Ho-Ri mock up. But there is nothing official about it. Just speculation.</p>
<p>Now there is also the tier 8 candidate Chi-Ri Kai created in the NA forums Japanese thread. Historically, there was no such project. The slope of the Chi-Ri Kai again came from the sloped Ho-Ri mock up. SS may have been thinking about the Chi-Ri Kai since the Chi-Ri II slope is really not much of a slope. An image of the Chi-Ri Kai was made by sp15 to help us visualize it as a possible tier 8 candidate. But in the end, the STA-1 actually existed so the made-up Chi-Ri Kai project was not needed as a tier 8 filler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1n_Soviet_Russia</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1n_Soviet_Russia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 05:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SerB the new head of Comcast customer service]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SerB the new head of Comcast customer service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dxzit</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216135</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dxzit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be honest, no one gives a flying fuck about Japanese tanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, no one gives a flying fuck about Japanese tanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legiondude</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legiondude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 01:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;correction the Lowë was sapposed to replace the Tiger II&quot;
No it wasn&#039;t, Lowe predates Tiger II by at least 9 months]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;correction the Lowë was sapposed to replace the Tiger II&#8221;<br />
No it wasn&#8217;t, Lowe predates Tiger II by at least 9 months</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legiondude</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legiondude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- developers decided not to implement Chi-Ri II (Chi-Ri with sloped armor)

That&#039;s the Chi-Se isn&#039;t it? Chi-Ri II being something else]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- developers decided not to implement Chi-Ri II (Chi-Ri with sloped armor)</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the Chi-Se isn&#8217;t it? Chi-Ri II being something else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treborn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/01/1-11-2014/#comment-216124</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Treborn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 22:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18798#comment-216124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Homer_J is right :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homer_J is right :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
