It’s their “sometimes in the very far future when the hardware situation will allow it” statement that drives me crazy. They are acting like there were only 1% players having decent PC. So fuck progress, not worth for 1% players. Hardware allowed it 3 years ago.

They all go like “our textures are so WOW SO MUCH HD your computers will never be able to run this game.”

Its just another fucking excuse for “yes the game runs like crap and looks like crap that somebody has eaten and shit it again. But we cannot do anything about it because you players, dont have better PC anyway”…

The 122-44 just works better as Tank Destroyer due to the heavy gun and therefore high alpha damage.

The T34 and Lowe in a map where there is no hull down are both second line tanks and should not be put in front, they are easily penned in the hull and will be removed from the battlefield instantly if facing anyone that is good at the game. If you want to take them into a city you need to have a position that will allow easy retreat, or be with another better armored or fast firing tank to offer support.

If it is an open map, then they are snipers, find a location where you can be constantly firing your gun and support the forward tanks. When the team bitches about a heavy sniping, make them notice what you did on the scoreboard at the end of the match… Fuck the people that think know everything in the game and how to play your tank, meanwhile the highest tier tank they have is a T8 premium, with a T5 as a non premium, a win rate of 43%, and a WN8 of 438.

Even typing that made me sad!

That’s a huge (and incorrect) logic jump.

Also: why is SU-122-44 regarded as so good and SU-100M1 as so bad when they are nearly identical? Hell, the only advantages 122-44 has is the higher damage and slightly better slope on the frontal armour, while having severe disadvantages.

Seriously guys, if I can do 4000 damage with the thing in tier 9 games, one of them as the last tank alive on my team by that point (the only other tank to do more than 1000 damage in that battle was a T30), then it doesn’t need preferential MM.

While I won’t disagree that the Lowe has sufficient armor for its tier… this is a rather silly/uninformative response. Yes, it has a mantlet that covers most of the turret (but mind you, getting a Lowe hull down is quite a hard task, and even then, if the enemies know about the small cheek weak spots, anything can punch through it with a steady aim). However, the Lowe is mostly a side scraper with enough side thickness to bounce tier X shots somewhat reliably. However, the turret ring bulge on the sides, while being a hard-to-hit target, occasionally catches shots that otherwise would have deflected. In general, just be cautious when angling the Lowe. Just thought I’d add to Storm’s comment.