<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hungarian Branch in WoT &#8211; Part 6: Problematic tank destroyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hungarian Branch in WoT &#8211; Part 7: The problems with the Tas rohamlöveg &#124; For the Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/#comment-218352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hungarian Branch in WoT &#8211; Part 7: The problems with the Tas rohamlöveg &#124; For the Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 08:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18945#comment-218352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Part I Part II: Light tanks Part III: Turán medium tanks Part IV: Tas medium tank Part V: Tier 2-4 tank destroyers Part VI: Problematic tank destroyers [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Part I Part II: Light tanks Part III: Turán medium tanks Part IV: Tas medium tank Part V: Tier 2-4 tank destroyers Part VI: Problematic tank destroyers [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assidiq Zidane</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/#comment-218277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Assidiq Zidane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18945#comment-218277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dat Ansaldo is cutee ~ &gt;w&lt;
*hnnnngh*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dat Ansaldo is cutee ~ &gt;w&lt;<br />
*hnnnngh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feketeretek</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/#comment-217995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feketeretek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18945#comment-217995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you SS, Karika, nice article again]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SS, Karika, nice article again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woras</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/#comment-217992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woras]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18945#comment-217992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know what happens with overbuffed tanks (VkB and FV4202, for exampels).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know what happens with overbuffed tanks (VkB and FV4202, for exampels).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bijte_Komouse!</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/06/hungarian-branch-in-wot-part-6-problematic-tank-destroyers/#comment-217974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bijte_Komouse!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=18945#comment-217974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, i stopped reading it halfway through, because everything is mostly speculation, and the last thing we want is to force WG to buff tanks on their own. Secondly, all of those TDs have basically no armor, so it would have been buffed on the gun, and we dont want another glasscannons either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i stopped reading it halfway through, because everything is mostly speculation, and the last thing we want is to force WG to buff tanks on their own. Secondly, all of those TDs have basically no armor, so it would have been buffed on the gun, and we dont want another glasscannons either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
