Comments on: 15.11.2014

By: gottwy CZ

gottwy CZ — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:32:07 +0000

““- some guns have “wrong” damage (inconsistent with other guns of its caliber)? “We will definitely fix that, as soon as we recieve the data on historical damage value these guns had”

Which guns ? I dont recall any (tho its not like I check every gun stats)”

Type 59 and T-54…

By: Ferdinand Porsche

Ferdinand Porsche — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:26:41 +0000

I am affraid they were serious, just like with all other bullshit historical changes. Game balance is more important than historical accuracy, but WG fail in both, for example by giving the vk45b 300mm effective lower plate. And also removing historical engine upgrades for german tanks..

By: Marián Markovič

Marián Markovič — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:47:44 +0000

When i wanna play Ruinberg or himmelsdorf, i just jump in Hummel

By: JBadger

JBadger — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 08:24:57 +0000

Top 5 Wargaming Comments:

1.) “When it’s done it’s done”
2.) “It’s a Server side game”
3.) “Working As Intended”
4.) “The Problem is obviously on your side”
5.) Any comments made that their player base are idiots, assholes etc.

By: Woras

Woras — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:46:26 +0000

Alpha means damage, not penetration :D

By: nononononono

nononononono — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 07:26:42 +0000

I’m gonna use my premium time up and then fuck this game off. Between WGEU employees and players, I don’t know who the most detestable faggots are…after playing this game for so long I have come to the conclusion that there is no more fun to be squeezed from this shitpile.

A real shame…I liked this game a lot…

By: JBadger

JBadger — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 05:14:27 +0000

Customer service training not a priority for wargaming.

By: JBadger

JBadger — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 05:11:29 +0000

Storm admits that the ramming system is screwed. It will be reworked and simplified by removing the fact that the armor calculated currently during the ramming is the one at the point of contact. Instead, the armor considered when ramming will simply be the nominal armor, taken from the tank characteristics (nominal front/side/rear armor) on the side that rammed (or got rammed).

Wow yet again a 180′ complete reversal from previous days comments. Where we just didn’t “understand” the new ramming system. That this system was much superior and it was just because of us stupid players who were used to the “old” system. Hmmm Soo how much other C%^P that storm tells us is bang on. He’s fast becoming the George Costanza of wargaming. Says one thing then it goes in the opposite direction.

By: Nadeah

Nadeah — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:10:02 +0000

First game: T37, map, Himmelsdorf tier 9
Second game: T37, map: Himmelsdorf tier 9
Switch tank
Third game: A-44, map: Steppes tier 8
Fourth game: A-44 map: Malinovka tier 9
Switch tank
Fifth game: WZ-131 map: Ensk tier 8
Sixth game: WZ-131 map: Mines tier 9
Switch tank
Seventh game: IS-3 map: Prokhorovka tier 10
Eight game; IS-3 map: Prokhorovka tier 9
Switch tank
Ninth game: T37 map: Ensk tier 9
Tenth game: T37 map: Lakeville tier 9

Such unlikely unfortunate streaks, happen much to you?
Just an example, I play mediums and mediums are pretty much good in every map except certain Russian mediums/ ( A-44 in open maps, Object 416 in city maps )

By: Hoxton

Hoxton — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 01:48:26 +0000

I don’t think the answer with the “historical damage” was serious ;)