Comments on: 17.11.2014

By: Mr_Ekshin

Mr_Ekshin — Wed, 19 Nov 2014 02:44:57 +0000

“loss of horsepower in transmission and drivetrain”
The MT-25 springs to mind. This was supposed to be driven by EACH wheel. This drivetrain would be very complicated and have VERY much power loss as a consequence.
This would make the MT-25 drive at more sensible speeds, and fully realize it’s potential as the worst scout ever conceived.

By: Frostbrewed

Frostbrewed — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:19:25 +0000

Pretty sure he meant HP = HorsePower

By: Frostbrewed

Frostbrewed — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:15:35 +0000

Damn, tell me who is going to win the MLB World Series this year, that can actually be worth something.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:52:50 +0000

Funniest part is Rus tanks are by far the worst, most sloppy tanks when it came to TQ loss over drivetrain “Slippage” “loss of horsepower in transmission and drivetrain”.

This is awesome as US tanks were amazing with TQ loss. They had mandatory engine/drivetrain loss of 3%…Rus tanks were 15-20% LOL, but have no fear T10 meds like 62a had hover technology and will be fine.

One more area US tanks were a hundred times better but it wont happen for “Balance reasons”

By: alex16

alex16 — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:16:36 +0000

Good one :)

By: Lowlife555

Lowlife555 — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:45:37 +0000

Q: “I have a SSD. Loading battles is fine, but whenever I quit the battle, it takes very long time for the results to load (I am stuck on “spinning wheel”), why is that? A friend of mine has a regular HDD and he has no such issues.” A (Storm): “It’s a problem with connection. After the fight is over, a large volume of data with battle statistics is transferred. And it’s this data pack that the game is waiting for, until it arrives. If you have packet loss, it’s possible to wait for it for a long time, until all the info is confirmed to have arrived.”

I think his answer is partly wrong.
I’m always last to load battleresult in, I have a Samsung EVO 840 1TB SSD where the OS and WOT is installed, and I can’t have packetloss for thousands of battles, rendering me last to load battleresults…
I think its connected to the sheer number of tanks I have in my garage, since even logging in, takes a long time for me.

By: another_one_bites_the_dust

another_one_bites_the_dust — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:38:13 +0000

/signed

This would be a great improvement and I’d even buy 1 year premium then.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:13:05 +0000

“loss of horsepower in transmission and drivetrain”.

Lol its so funny Rus meds with 580 HP engines are faster than Pattons with 800+ engines.

Hell T54 had 520 HP with 20% loss from crankshaft to drivewheels.

Also T54 V engine was 10 liters larger of a motor and US AVDS still had 300 HP more.

By: Chad Mesiroff

Chad Mesiroff — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:10:22 +0000

The new one is huge. Loss of TQ from slop is very very real. Bad part is the US was the most advanced by far with only 2-3% lost in the hydrostatic gears and transmision bands where the T54 and Rus tanks lost upwards of 20%….LOLOL

By: JBadger

JBadger — Tue, 18 Nov 2014 08:03:55 +0000

World’s most dangerous phrase in business:

BUT We’ve always done it this way