Comments on: Chieftain’s Hatch – Object 268, Part 1 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: DMminion http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-223489 Thu, 20 Nov 2014 02:58:28 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-223489 I saw the video a few hours ago you’re talking about. It’s pretty russian, driving out and in, leaking like fuck. …

June 20. 2014.
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/06/20/object-268-in-motion/

]]> By: Fedaykin89 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-223139 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:40:53 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-223139 That’s just it – I swear I saw the video on the 268, with all its oil leaking glory, at least 2 months ago.

Oooor… yeah, Woras might be right and it wasn’t a Chieftain video, but a separate RU video presenting the 269 altogether.

Curse my memory…

]]> By: Hustodemon Zewel von Lelek http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-223042 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:14:32 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-223042 you should note that that KT has it’s tracks about 30 to 50 cm lower than Sherman (a fact that is many times “overlooked” by those who use it for evidence that Sherman should be taller than KT… ;) )

]]> By: ABC_Przyrody http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-223033 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:07:05 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-223033 268 has correct size in WoT.

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/403477-ingame-object-268-wrong-height/page__pid__8379272#entry8379272

]]> By: evi7stylez . http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-222991 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:25:00 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-222991 Especially if it’s uploaded 7 hours ago ;)

]]> By: Woras http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-222982 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:55:32 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-222982 There was ruskie video I think.

]]> By: Fedaykin89 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-222980 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:52:28 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-222980 Dafuq? I saw this video 2 or 3 months ago…

]]> By: Nadeah http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-222977 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:48:20 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-222977 From what I could gather from HEAT mechanics it would penetrate the outer plate but the inner plate would like not be penetrated because of pressure loss due to open space behind the outer armour. Heat really doesn’t like open spaces behind armour.

]]> By: Saibot Leffesch http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-222976 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:43:32 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-222976 Sherman next to a KT
http://ww2helmets.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/29pdq9v.jpg

Maus hull is not that much taller than KTs hull. But its just a massive tank. Everything is big on this one.
http://blog.tankpedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/maus_2014.jpg

Chieftain next to Maus hull.
http://abload.de/img/unbenanntoqf2r.jpg
Gives u a good size comparison in case of both, Maus hull and Obj. 268.

]]> By: Not_me http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/19/chieftains-hatch-object-268-part-1/#comment-222973 Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:37:57 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19318#comment-222973 sounds like someone doesnt know how heat works in RL ;)

]]>