<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FV4004 Conway Pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skyguy7567</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skyguy7567]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KV-4004

Put a short stubby 152mm howitzer on it and the turret is a KV-2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KV-4004</p>
<p>Put a short stubby 152mm howitzer on it and the turret is a KV-2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyberMaroon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CyberMaroon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It only mentions it doesn&#039;t carry the penetration penalty. Your assumption is thusly based on nothing. And since they do keep the higher muzzle velocity bonus, I think the assumption that the unmentioned normalisation remains the same is a more valid one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only mentions it doesn&#8217;t carry the penetration penalty. Your assumption is thusly based on nothing. And since they do keep the higher muzzle velocity bonus, I think the assumption that the unmentioned normalisation remains the same is a more valid one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doddy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So because one thing must be another unrelated thing, gj.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So because one thing must be another unrelated thing, gj&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wehrmacht Panzergrenadier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wehrmacht Panzergrenadier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, they don&#039;t.

The Tier 10 mediums do not suffer any penalties that normal APCR rounds get.

NA Server Wiki: &quot;Tanks whose guns default to APCR are also not subject to the same penetration loss over distance as premium APCR, but still have the higher muzzle velocity.&quot;

According to this, I am going to assume that it also neglects the normalization penalty. I checked other sections of the wiki, and no specific data to be found. 

Pretty much (In practice) the T10 APCR shells are AP shells, with higher pen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The Tier 10 mediums do not suffer any penalties that normal APCR rounds get.</p>
<p>NA Server Wiki: &#8220;Tanks whose guns default to APCR are also not subject to the same penetration loss over distance as premium APCR, but still have the higher muzzle velocity.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to this, I am going to assume that it also neglects the normalization penalty. I checked other sections of the wiki, and no specific data to be found. </p>
<p>Pretty much (In practice) the T10 APCR shells are AP shells, with higher pen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArmoredColossus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArmoredColossus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That tank is so ugly someone needs to shoot it and put it out of it&#039;s misery :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That tank is so ugly someone needs to shoot it and put it out of it&#8217;s misery :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227331</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, they still have less normalization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they still have less normalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3Form</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3Form]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 20:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might be mistaken but I thought that it&#039;s always been the case that guns where APCR is the standard credit ammo do not suffer the normalisation malus that &quot;gold&quot; APCR rounds are subject to.

The 120 gets more overmatch, I suppose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be mistaken but I thought that it&#8217;s always been the case that guns where APCR is the standard credit ammo do not suffer the normalisation malus that &#8220;gold&#8221; APCR rounds are subject to.</p>
<p>The 120 gets more overmatch, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex78i</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alex78i]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pinocchio..is that you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pinocchio..is that you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yurra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Against flat surfaces and because of muzzle velocity, yes. But 120mm has more normalization so it means it&#039;s more useful against sloped armor, which every single tank at tier 9/10 has anyway.
Also, those stats for the L7 are probably not actual anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against flat surfaces and because of muzzle velocity, yes. But 120mm has more normalization so it means it&#8217;s more useful against sloped armor, which every single tank at tier 9/10 has anyway.<br />
Also, those stats for the L7 are probably not actual anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klint_Izwudd</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/26/fv4004-conway-pictures/#comment-227262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klint_Izwudd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=19630#comment-227262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warning label on a tank.

Definitely British.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warning label on a tank.</p>
<p>Definitely British.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
